Literature DB >> 7550809

Housing subsidies and pediatric undernutrition.

A Meyers1, D A Frank, N Roos, K E Peterson, V A Casey, L A Cupples, S M Levenson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that receipt of housing subsidies by poor families is associated with improved nutritional status of their children.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Pediatric emergency department of an urban municipal hospital. PATIENTS: Convenience sample of 203 children younger than 3 years and their families who were being seen during one of twenty-seven 24-hour periods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anthropometric indicators (z scores of weight for age, weight-for-height, and height-for-age), and the proportion of children with low growth indicator (weight-for-height below the 10th percentile or height-for-age below the fifth percentile, or both, of the reference population).
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis controlling for demographics and program participation showed that receipt of housing assistance contributed significantly to z scores for weight-for-age (P = .03) and weight-for-height (P = .04). The risk of a child's having low growth indicators was 21.6% for children whose families were on the waiting list for housing assistance compared with 3.3% for those whose families received subsidies (adjusted odds ratio = 8.2, 95% confidence interval = 2.2 to 30.4, P = .002)
CONCLUSION: Receiving a housing subsidy is associated with increased growth in children from low-income families, an effect that is consistent with a protective effect of housing subsidies against childhood undernutrition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7550809     DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170230033004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med        ISSN: 1072-4710


  10 in total

Review 1.  Housing and health: time again for public health action.

Authors:  James Krieger; Donna L Higgins
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Is child health at risk while families wait for housing vouchers?

Authors:  J Sharfstein; M Sandel; R Kahn; H Bauchner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Health impact assessment of housing improvements: incorporating research evidence.

Authors:  H Thomson; M Petticrew; M Douglas
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Protecting health using an environmental impact assessment: a case study of San Francisco land use decisionmaking.

Authors:  Rajiv Bhatia
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Seasonal variation in weight-for-age in a pediatric emergency room.

Authors:  D A Frank; N Roos; A Meyers; M Napoleone; K Peterson; A Cather; L A Cupples
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Housing Assistance and Child Health: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Natalie Slopen; Andrew Fenelon; Sandra Newman; Michel Boudreaux
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  The Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Housing Checkup: A survey of the housing needs of children and youth.

Authors:  Sarah Waterston; Jama Watt; Isabelle Gaboury; Lindy Samson
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.253

8.  Effects of child health on housing in the urban U.S.

Authors:  Marah A Curtis; Hope Corman; Kelly Noonan; Nancy E Reichman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  The appearance of discretionary income: influence on the prevalence of under- and over-nutrition.

Authors:  Robert J Karp; Cindy Cheng; Alan F Meyers
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2005-06-28

Review 10.  Economic instruments for population diet and physical activity behaviour change: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Ian Shemilt; Gareth J Hollands; Theresa M Marteau; Ryota Nakamura; Susan A Jebb; Michael P Kelly; Marc Suhrcke; David Ogilvie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.