Literature DB >> 7550614

Information acquired by the hippocampus interferes with acquisition of the amygdala-based conditioned-cue preference in the rat.

R J McDonald1, N M White.   

Abstract

White and McDonald (1993, Behav Brain Res 55:269-281) previously reported that animals with amygdala lesions failed to acquire a conditioned-cue preference (CCP) based on spatial cues, but that animals with fornix lesions exhibited larger CCPs of this type than normal animals. The present experiments focused on the hippocampal interference with amygdala-based CCP learning inferred from this finding. In experiment 1 we tested the hypothesis that this interference was due to the acquisition of information about the maze and its environment during a 10 min period of free exploration of the maze before the start of CCP training, hitherto given to all animals in these experiments. Normal animals that were not preexposed to the maze and animals that were preexposed to a similar maze in a different room both exhibited larger CCPs than animals that were preexposed to the same maze in the same room as CCP training and testing. This suggests that normal animals acquire context-specific information during the preexposure period and that this may be the cause of the hippocampus-based interference with the amygdala-mediated CCP. In experiment 2 we attempted to determine if the information thought to be acquired by the hippocampal memory system interferes with acquisition or expression of the CCP. As previously demonstrated, animals that received fornix lesions before preexposure (i.e., before the start of the experiment) exhibited larger than normal CCPs. Animals that received fornix lesions after preexposure but before CCP training and animals that received fornix lesions after CCP training but before testing both exhibited normal CCPs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7550614     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.450050305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  19 in total

1.  The differential outcomes procedure can interfere or enhance operant rule learning.

Authors:  Raddy Ramos; Lisa M Savage
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar

2.  Hippocampal infusions of pyruvate reverse the memory-impairing effects of septal muscimol infusions.

Authors:  Desiree L Krebs; Marise B Parent
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 4.432

Review 3.  The reuniens and rhomboid nuclei: neuroanatomy, electrophysiological characteristics and behavioral implications.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Cassel; Anne Pereira de Vasconcelos; Michaël Loureiro; Thibault Cholvin; John C Dalrymple-Alford; Robert P Vertes
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 11.685

4.  Acetylcholine release in the hippocampus and striatum during place and response training.

Authors:  Jason C Pych; Qing Chang; Cynthia Colon-Rivera; Renee Haag; Paul E Gold
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Differential modulation of changes in hippocampal-septal synaptic excitability by the amygdala as a function of either elemental or contextual fear conditioning in mice.

Authors:  A Desmedt; R Garcia; R Jaffard
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Competition between memory systems: acetylcholine release in the hippocampus correlates negatively with good performance on an amygdala-dependent task.

Authors:  Christa K McIntyre; Shanthi N Pal; Lisa K Marriott; Paul E Gold
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Hippocampus and retrograde amnesia in the rat model: a modest proposal for the situation of systems consolidation.

Authors:  Robert J Sutherland; Fraser T Sparks; Hugo Lehmann
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Switching memory systems during learning: changes in patterns of brain acetylcholine release in the hippocampus and striatum in rats.

Authors:  Qing Chang; Paul E Gold
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Memory modulation across neural systems: intra-amygdala glucose reverses deficits caused by intraseptal morphine on a spatial task but not on an aversive task.

Authors:  E C McNay; P E Gold
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Sex Differences in Context Fear Generalization and Recruitment of Hippocampus and Amygdala during Retrieval.

Authors:  Ashley A Keiser; Lacie M Turnbull; Mara A Darian; Dana E Feldman; Iris Song; Natalie C Tronson
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 7.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.