Literature DB >> 7549715

Flaws in agist arguments. Doctors need pragmatic strategies.

R J Lilford.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1995        PMID： 7549715      PMCID： PMC2550749          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.311.7007.752a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  1 in total

1.  Protecting elderly people: flaws in ageist arguments.

Authors:  M M Rivlin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-05-06
  1 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Experience adjusted life years and critical medical allocations within the British context: which patient should live?

Authors:  Michal Pruski
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2018-12

2.  Why the fair innings argument is not persuasive.

Authors:  Michael M Rivlin
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2000-12-21       Impact factor: 2.652
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.