Literature DB >> 7549356

Accurate coronary calcium phosphate mass measurements from electron beam computed tomograms.

R Detrano1, W Tang, X Kang, P Mahaisavariya, M McCrae, D Garner, S K Peng, C Measham, S Molloi, D Gutfinger.   

Abstract

Precipitates of calcium phosphate in coronary arteries always indicate the presence of atherosclerosis. The mass of these precipitates is related to the severity of atherosclerosis. To determine the accuracy of electron beam computed tomographic (CT) mass estimates, we imaged 21 human hearts inside an anthropomorphic chest phantom using an Imatron C-100 electron beam CT scanner (Imatron, San Francisco, CA). We then incinerated the 63 imaged coronary arteries and weighed the mineral ash. We calculated the mass estimates from the images using an algorithm derived from a model that assumes simple radiographic properties of the coronary arteries. We also calculated the currently used coronary calcium score for each artery. Although both the mass estimates and the scores correlated with the actual mass of the incinerated specimens (r = .97 and r = .93), the correlation with the mass estimates was better (P = .02; William's test). The regression equation relating the actual mass to the mass estimates was y = 1.37 x + 14, indicating that the CT mass estimates consistently underestimate actual coronary calcium phosphate mass. We conclude that relative mass estimates using electron beam CT scanning are accurate and that both these and the currently employed calcium scores reflect the actual mass of precipitated calcium phosphate in diseased coronary arteries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7549356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Card Imaging        ISSN: 0887-7971


  8 in total

1.  Improving the CAC Score by Addition of Regional Measures of Calcium Distribution: Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Michael J Blaha; Matthew J Budoff; Rajesh Tota-Maharaj; Zeina A Dardari; Nathan D Wong; Richard A Kronmal; John Eng; Wendy S Post; Roger S Blumenthal; Khurram Nasir
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-04-13

2.  Body surface area is a predictor of coronary artery calcium, whereas body mass index is not.

Authors:  Sion K Roy; Irfan Zeb; Jigar Kadakia; Dong Li; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.439

Review 3.  Potential use of Ca++ scanning to determine the need for and intensity of lipid-lowering therapy in asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  A D Guerci; Y Arad
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Electron beam computed tomography: screening for coronary artery disease.

Authors:  M J Budoff; B H Brundage
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 5.  Update on using coronary calcium screening by computed tomography to measure risk for coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Brad H Thompson; William Stanford
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Non-invasive coronary angiography with multi-detector computed tomography: comparison to conventional X-ray angiography.

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur E Stillman; Sandy S Halliburton; Stacie A Kuzmiak; Tracy Painter; Richard D White
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 7.  Is atherosclerosis regression a realistic goal of statin therapy and what does that mean?

Authors:  Mukesh Singh; Updesh Singh Bedi
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.113

8.  Feasibility of spectral shaping for detection and quantification of coronary calcifications in ultra-low dose CT.

Authors:  Marleen Vonder; Gert Jan Pelgrim; Sèvrin E M Huijsse; Mathias Meyer; Marcel J W Greuter; Thomas Henzler; Thomas G Flohr; Matthijs Oudkerk; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.