Literature DB >> 7547806

Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: functional results of primary and secondary operations in comparison to the pull-through method in anorectal malformations.

W Mulder1, E de Jong, I Wauters, M Kinders, H A Heij, A Vos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Control of defaecation after surgical correction of high and intermediate types of congenital anorectal malformations is difficult. The posterior sagittal approach with careful reconstruction of the external sphincter is postulated to give a better outcome than the pull-through operation. The functional results of these procedures performed in one centre were evaluated in order to identify prognostic factors.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1979 and 1992 66 patients with high or intermediate congenital anorectal anomalies were treated in our centre. In 16 patients a pull-through operation (Kĩesewetter-Rehbein) was performed. After 1984, the posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) (Peña and deVries) was used in 35 patients as the primary operation. In 22 patients a PSARP operation was done as a secondary procedure, in one third of these patients after a previous pull-through operation in our centre. The functional results were analysed in retrospect.
RESULTS: Sixty operations in 53 patients could be evaluated. The overall continence rate was 34%. After the pull-through operation six out of 15 patients (40%) were continent, after a primary PSARP 10 out of 25 (40%) and after a secondary PSARP operation five out of 20 patients (25%). Patients with a sacral defect were continent only in 16% as compared to 44% of the patients with a normal sacrum. Sex was also relevant: 67% of the girls were continent, compared to 30% of the boys. Ten out of 11 girls (90%) with a normal sacrum became continent.
CONCLUSION: The PSARP for high and intermediate anorectal malformations does not give better functional results than the pull-through operation. The prognosis is determined by other factors than the type of operation, notably sex and the presence or absence of sacral defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7547806     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1066197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0939-7248            Impact factor:   2.191


  4 in total

1.  Management of anorectal malformations in Varanasi, India: a long-term review of single and three stage procedures.

Authors:  A N Gangopadhyay; S Chooramani Gopal; Shilpa Sharma; D K Gupta; S P Sharma; T Vittal Mohan
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2005-11-29       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Unexpected results of a nationwide, treatment-independent assessment of fecal incontinence in patients with anorectal anomalies.

Authors:  Eberhard Schmiedeke; Nadine Zwink; Nicole Schwarzer; Enrika Bartels; Dominik Schmidt; Sabine Grasshoff-Derr; Stefan Holland-Cunz; Stuart Hosie; Karsten Jablonka; Stefanie Maerzheuser; Heiko Reutter; Christian Lorenz; Ekkehart Jenetzky
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Abnormal anatomy of the lumbosacral region imaged by magnetic resonance in children with anorectal malformations.

Authors:  H A Heij; R A Nievelstein; I de Zwart; B W Verbeeten; J Valk; A Vos
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Normal anorectal musculatures and changes in anorectal malformation.

Authors:  Long Li; Xianghai Ren; Hui Xiao; Changlin Wang; Hang Xu; Anxiao Ming; Xueqi Wang; Zheng Li; Mei Diao; Wei Cheng
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 1.827

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.