Literature DB >> 7547657

Perceptions of side effects following axillary block used for outpatient surgery.

K Cooper1, H Kelley, J Carrithers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The study evaluated patient perceptions of side effects related to axillary block (AB) and how they might influence a patient's decisions about subsequent ABs.
METHODS: A questionnaire concerning the occurrence and duration of side effects following AB and patient preference for a subsequent AB was completed and returned by each of 1,149 patients. All ABs were performed using a 22 gauge short bevel needle. In all 86.5% had orthopedic surgery, with the remainder vascular access procedures. Three AB techniques and two anesthetic solutions were used.
RESULTS: Patient-reported incidences of side effects were bruising, 19.1%; soreness, 39.7%; persistent numbness, 11.0%; and nausea, 10.8%. Bruising was reported more frequently by female patients, those undergoing orthopedic procedures, and those between 20 and 30 and over 80 years of age. Soreness was reported more frequently in orthopedic procedures and by those aged 20 to 30. Technique used did not affect the incidence of side effects or patient willingness to have a repeat AB. Ninety-three percent expressed willingness to have another AB; this was affected by whether the patient experienced a side effect, the duration of the side effect, and by the number of side effects experienced. Those between the ages of 20 and 40 were less willing to have another AB.
CONCLUSIONS: Even though 51% of the patients reported at least one side effect, 93% would choose to have another AB, indicating a high overall satisfaction with AB anesthesia, which significantly decreased as the number and duration of side effects increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7547657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth        ISSN: 0146-521X


  2 in total

Review 1.  Upper extremity regional anesthesia: essentials of our current understanding, 2008.

Authors:  Joseph M Neal; J C Gerancher; James R Hebl; Brian M Ilfeld; Colin J L McCartney; Carlo D Franco; Quinn H Hogan
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.288

2.  Regional anaesthesia is associated with less patient satisfaction compared to general anaesthesia following distal upper extremity surgery: a prospective double centred observational study.

Authors:  Wouter Droog; Sanne E Hoeks; G Peter van Aggelen; D-Yin Lin; J Henk Coert; Robert Jan Stolker; Eilish M Galvin
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.217

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.