Literature DB >> 7546216

Physiological mechanisms regulating the conversion of selenite to elemental selenium by Bacillus subtilis.

C Garbisu1, S Gonzalez, W H Yang, B C Yee, D L Carlson, A Yee, N R Smith, R Otero, B B Buchanan, T Leighton.   

Abstract

We have demonstrated that the common soil bacterium, Bacillus subtilis, reduces selenite to an insoluble and much less toxic product--the red form of elemental selenium. Reduction was effected by an inducible system that appears to deposit elemental selenium between the cell wall and the plasma membrane. Glucose and sucrose supported selenite reduction. Although malate and citrate supported growth, no significant reduction of selenite occurred, indicating the importance of the redox state of the culture substrate. Selenite reduction in the millimolar concentration range (i.e., cultures supplemented with 1 mM selenite) was not affected by a ten-fold excess of nitrate or sulfate--compounds that serve as alternate electron acceptors and antagonize selenite reduction by anaerobic bacteria. Similarly, nitrite and sulfite did not significantly affect the rate or extent of selenite reduction. B.subtilis was able to grow and produce selenium (Se degree) at selenite concentrations ranging from 0.6 microM to 5 mM (50 ppb to 395 ppm selenium). At the lowest selenite concentration tested, 50 ppb selenium, B.subtilis removed 95% of the selenite from the liquid phase. The results suggest that selenite is reduced via an inducible detoxification system rather than dissimilatory electron transport. The findings establish the potential utility of B.subtilis for the bioremediation of selenite-polluted sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7546216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofactors        ISSN: 0951-6433            Impact factor:   6.113


  7 in total

1.  Selenite and tellurite reduction by Shewanella oneidensis.

Authors:  Agnieszka Klonowska; Thierry Heulin; André Vermeglio
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Heavy metal resistance patterns of Frankia strains.

Authors:  Joel W Richards; Glenn D Krumholz; Matthew S Chval; Louis S Tisa
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Chemical forms of selenium in the metal-resistant bacterium Ralstonia metallidurans CH34 exposed to selenite and selenate.

Authors:  Géraldine Sarret; Laure Avoscan; Marie Carrière; Richard Collins; Nicolas Geoffroy; Francine Carrot; Jacques Covès; Barbara Gouget
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Bioavailability of selenium accumulated by selenite-reducing bacteria.

Authors:  G F Combs; C Garbisu; B C Yee; A Yee; D E Carlson; N R Smith; A C Magyarosy; T Leighton; B B Buchanan
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Thioredoxin h overexpressed in barley seeds enhances selenite resistance and uptake during germination and early seedling development.

Authors:  Yong-Bum Kim; Carlos Garbisu; Ingrid J Pickering; Roger C Prince; Graham N George; Myeong-Je Cho; Joshua H Wong; Bob B Buchanan
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  Characterization of a Novel Porin-Like Protein, ExtI, from Geobacter sulfurreducens and Its Implication in the Reduction of Selenite and Tellurite.

Authors:  Mst Ishrat Jahan; Ryuta Tobe; Hisaaki Mihara
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-03-11       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Transcriptional Response of Selenopolypeptide Genes and Selenocysteine Biosynthesis Machinery Genes in Escherichia coli during Selenite Reduction.

Authors:  Antonia Y Tetteh; Katherine H Sun; Chiu-Yueh Hung; Farooqahmed S Kittur; Gordon C Ibeanu; Daniel Williams; Jiahua Xie
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.