Literature DB >> 7544201

Palliation of obstructive nephropathy due to malignancy.

K J Harrington1, H S Pandha, S A Kelly, H E Lambert, J E Jackson, J Waxman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a prospective study of patients with malignant obstructive uropathy treated actively by percutaneous nephrostomy and J-J ureteric stents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients (27 men, 15 women, median age 62 years, range 29-83) with obstructive nephropathy secondary to malignancy underwent urinary diversion followed, where appropriate, by active treatment of the underlying cancer.
RESULTS: The median survival of all patients was 133 (range 7-712) days. Seventeen patients (40%) survived for > 6 months and five (12%) for < 1 month. Patients who had received no prior therapy and for whom further therapeutic options were available were more likely to benefit from urinary diversion. In nine patients (21%) nephrostomy insertion failed to relieve renal failure. In 20 patients (48%) obstructive nephropathy recurred. The procedure was complicated by urinary tract or nephrostomy site infection in 16 patients, by septicaemia in six patients, by percutaneous urine leak in 13 patients and by pelvi-calyceal perforation in two patients, but not by haemorrhage or death. The median percentage of the patients' remaining life which was spent in hospital was 23.6% (range 2.2-100).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients likely to benefit from nephrostomy were those for whom there were therapeutic options available for the treatment of their malignancy. Prolonged survival is possible in obstructive nephropathy secondary to malignancy, which should no longer be cited as an absolute contra-indication to urinary diversion. Patients unlikely to benefit from urinary diversion can also be identified and they should not routinely undergo this intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7544201     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1995.tb07841.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  6 in total

1.  Outcomes of stent-change therapy for bilateral malignancy-related ureteral obstruction.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Song; Sahyun Pak; In Gab Jeong; Kun Suk Kim; Hyung Keun Park; Choung-Soo Kim; Hanjong Ahn; Bumsik Hong
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Clinical outcome and management of ureteral obstruction secondary to gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Migita; Akihiko Watanabe; Shoji Samma; Takao Ohyama; Hirofumi Ishikawa; Yoriaki Kagebayashi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Long-term survival is possible after stenting for malignant ureteric obstruction in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Oliver M Jones; Solomon K P John; Richard J Lawrance; J Basil J Fozard
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Retrograde pyelography predicts retrograde ureteral stenting failure and reduces unnecessary stenting trials in patients with advanced non-urological malignant ureteral obstruction.

Authors:  Sung Han Kim; Boram Park; Jungnam Joo; Jae Young Joung; Ho Kyung Seo; Jinsoo Chung; Kang Hyun Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Renal function is associated with prognosis in stent-change therapy for malignant ureteral obstruction.

Authors:  Ji Hyung Yoon; Sejun Park; Sungchan Park; Kyung Hyun Moon; Sang Hyeon Cheon; Taekmin Kwon
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2018-10-26

6.  Malignant ureteral obstruction: Whether decompression really improves patient outcomes and quality of life?

Authors:  K Muruganandham; Rakesh Kapoor
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.