Literature DB >> 7543997

Attitudes to prenatal screening, diagnosis and research among pregnant women who accept or decline an alpha-fetoprotein test.

F S Jørgensen1.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to describe the opinion of pregnant women who had accepted or declined an alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) test, not only on AFP screening in general, but also on whether every pregnant woman should be offered amniocentesis (AC)/chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and an ultrasound scan for fetal malformations. An additional aim was to describe pregnant women's attitudes concerning continued research in the prenatal field. The study was performed as a questionnaire study in two regions over a 1-year period from 1 October 1988 to 30 September 1989. Results are based on answers from 3331 women who had taken an AFP test and 336 women who had declined the offer of a test. A total of 79 per cent of the women thought that an AFP test, 70 per cent that an ultrasound scan for fetal malformations, and 26 per cent that AC or CVS should be offered to all pregnant women. Fifty-nine per cent of the women were positive towards continued research in the prenatal field. Women who had had an AFP test were generally much more positive towards screening and research than women who had declined, who were generally against. Women who had left school without a high school degree were on average more positive towards the screening issues that women who had this degree. In conclusion, the results obtained in this study strongly suggest that women's attitudes are very dependent on how the prenatal screening programme is already organized in their local area.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7543997     DOI: 10.1002/pd.1970150504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  3 in total

1.  Participation in maternal serum screening for Down syndrome, neural tube defects, and trisomy 18 following screen-positive results in a previous pregnancy.

Authors:  D N Rausch; G M Lambert-Messerlian; J A Canick
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-09

2.  Attitudes to participating in a birth cohort study, views from a multiethnic population: a qualitative study using focus groups.

Authors:  Neeru Garg; Thomas P Round; Gavin Daker-White; Peter Bower; Chris J Griffiths
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Reasons for non-participation in malformation scans in Denmark: a cohort study.

Authors:  Karina Hjort-Pedersen; Annette Wind Olesen; Ester Garne; Lene Sperling
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.