Literature DB >> 7543774

Clinical evaluation of serum alpha-fetoprotein and circulating immune complexes as tumour markers of hepatocellular carcinoma.

J F Tsai1, J E Jeng, M S Ho, W Y Chang, Z Y Lin, J H Tsai.   

Abstract

To evaluate the diagnostic application of serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and circulating immune complexes (CICs), AFP, 3% polyethylene glycol (PEG)-CICs, 4% PEG-CICs, and C1q-CICs were determined in 101 patients with cirrhosis alone, 101 sex-matched and age-matched cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 54 healthy controls. Multivariate analysis indicated that AFP (odds ratio 1.014; 95% confidence interval 1.004-1.024) and 3% PEG-CICs (odds ratio 1.011; 95% confidence interval 1.005-1.017) are associated, in a dose-related fashion, with an increased risk for HCC. A receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cut-off values of AFP (120 ng ml-1) and 3% PEG-CICs (310 micrograms aggregated IgG equivalent ml-1). The area under ROC curve was 0.875 for AFP and 0.812 for 3% PEG-CIC. Both AFP and 3% PEG-CICs show a high specificity (100%) and positive likelihood ratio. The sensitivity was 65.3% for 3% PEG-CICs and 67.3% for AFP. Determination of both markers in parallel significantly increase the diagnostic accuracy (92.1%) and sensitivity (84%), with a high specificity (100%) and positive likelihood ratio (> 84). In conclusion, both 3% PEG-CICs and AFP are independent risk factors of HCC, and may be used as complementary tumour markers to discriminate HCC from cirrhosis. Determination of 3% PEG-CICs should be performed in cirrhotics negative for AFP to improve detection of HCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7543774      PMCID: PMC2033981          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1995.352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  30 in total

1.  Role of the liver in controlling the immunogenicity of commensal bacteria in the gut.

Authors:  H C Thomas; R N McSween; R G White
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1973-06-09       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Purification of acute phase anti-hepatitis A virus (HAV) IgM and development of an IgM solid-phase radioimmunoassay for the detection of HAV.

Authors:  H A Fields; K A McCaustland; D W Bradley; J E Maynard
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1982-06-11       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Intrinsically stable IgG aggregates.

Authors:  D McCarthy; D H Goddard; B K Pell; E J Holborow
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  In vivo uptake of immune complexes by parenchymal and nonparenchymal liver cells in mice.

Authors:  U Hopf; H E Schaefer; G Hess; K H Meyer Zum Büschenfelde
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  IgE-containing circulating immune complexes in Churg-Strauss vasculitis.

Authors:  B J Manger; F E Krapf; M Gramatzki; H G Nüsslein; G R Burmester; P B Krauledat; J R Kalden
Journal:  Scand J Immunol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.487

6.  Evaluation of different methods for detecting circulating immune complexes. An inter-laboratory study.

Authors:  G Füst; M Kavai; G Szegedi; K Meretey; A Falus; A Lenkey; M Misz
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Immune complexes and human neoplasia.

Authors:  F A Salinas; K H Wee; H K Silver
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 6.529

8.  Circulating immune complexes as "tumor marker" in hepatoma-bearing rats (Yoshida AH 130).

Authors:  B Neri
Journal:  Immunol Lett       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 3.685

9.  Circulating immune complexes in chronic hepatitis related to hepatitis C and B viruses infection.

Authors:  J F Tsai; H S Margolis; J E Jeng; M S Ho; W Y Chang; Z Y Lin; J H Tsai
Journal:  Clin Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  1995-04

10.  Chronic liver disease: the detection and characterization of circulating immune complexes.

Authors:  S E Brown; M W Steward; L Viola; C R Howard; I M Murray-Lyon
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 7.397

View more
  6 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of tumor markers for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ryosuke Tateishi; Haruhiko Yoshida; Yutaka Matsuyama; Norio Mine; Yuji Kondo; Masao Omata
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2007-12-29       Impact factor: 6.047

2.  Abdominal ultrasound and alpha-foetoprotein for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Agostino Colli; Tin Nadarevic; Damir Miletic; Vanja Giljaca; Mirella Fraquelli; Davor Štimac; Giovanni Casazza
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 3.  Persistent increase in alpha-fetoprotein level in a patient without underlying liver disease who underwent curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Isidoro Di Carlo; Maurizio Mannino; Adriana Toro; Annalisa Ardiri; Antonio Galia; Giovanni Cappello; Gaetano Bertino
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 2.754

4.  Elevated urinary transforming growth factor-beta1 level as a tumour marker and predictor of poor survival in cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  J F Tsai; J E Jeng; L Y Chuang; M L Yang; M S Ho; W Y Chang; M Y Hsieh; Z Y Lin; J H Tsai
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Clinical evaluation of urinary transforming growth factor-beta1 and serum alpha-fetoprotein as tumour markers of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  J F Tsai; J E Jeng; L Y Chuang; M L Yang; M S Ho; W Y Chang; M Y Hsieh; Z Y Lin; J H Tsai
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Additive effect modification of hepatitis B surface antigen and e antigen on the development of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  J F Tsai; J E Jeng; M S Ho; W Y Chang; M Y Hsieh; Z Y Lin; J H Tsai
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.