Literature DB >> 754287

Clinical application of decision analysis: a detailed illustration.

S G Pauker, J P Kassirer.   

Abstract

The clinician must always optimize the patient's chance for the best possible outcome, but the complex task of deciding which diagnostic study to perform and which therapeutic agent to administer is usually carried out using imperfect information. These critical decisions are usually made in a covert fashion without explicit consideration of the multiple factors that impact on the outcome. Decision analysis is a quantitative method for making such diagnostic and therapeutic judgments, incorporating both probabilistic data and value judgments in the analysis of clinical problems. This article presents a brief overview of decision analysis and a detailed illustration of its use in an actual complex clinical situation. The clinical problem described consists of the management of suspected pulmonary embolism in a patient with a high risk of complications from both pulmonary arteriography and long-term anticoagulation. The example chosen also points up the virtue of decision analysis in considering prospectively both the information content and the attendant risks of contemplated diagnostic procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 754287     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-2998(78)80018-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  6 in total

1.  Cholera vaccination: a decision analysis.

Authors:  D W MacPherson; M Tonkin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Interpretation of diagnostic data: 6. How to do it with more complex maths.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1983-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Applicability of decision analysis to everyday clinical practice: a controlled feasibility trial.

Authors:  A Morabia; M Steinig-Stamm; P F Unger; D Slosman; P A Schneider; A Perrier; A F Junod
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Concordance between decision analysis and matching systematic review of randomized controlled trials in assessment of treatment comparisons: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rahul S Mhaskar; Hesborn Wao; Helen Mahony; Ambuj Kumar; Benjamin Djulbegovic
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Evaluating the impact of policies recommending PrEP to subpopulations of men and transgender women who have sex with men based on demographic and behavioral risk factors.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Marshall D Brown; David V Glidden; Kenneth H Mayer; Susan P Buchbinder; Vanessa M McMahan; Mauro Schechter; Juan Guanira; Martin Casapia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evaluating Biomarkers for Guiding Treatment Decisions.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Tajik Parvin
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2015-01-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.