Literature DB >> 7541704

Differential age-related influences on memory for verbal-symbolic information and visual-spatial information?

T A Salthouse1.   

Abstract

Adults from a wide range of ages were administered parallel versions of three memory tasks designed to involve verbal-symbolic information or visual-spatial information. Several analytical procedures were used to determine whether there were selective age-related effects on measures reflecting spatial information processing compared to those reflecting verbal-symbolic information processing. The results provided little support for this hypothesis and instead were consistent with the existence of a common age-related factor that contributes to the age differences in many cognitive measures.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7541704     DOI: 10.1093/geronb/50b.4.p193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci        ISSN: 1079-5014            Impact factor:   4.077


  6 in total

1.  Divergent trajectories in the aging mind: changes in working memory for affective versus visual information with age.

Authors:  Joseph A Mikels; Gregory R Larkin; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Laura L Cartensen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2005-12

Review 2.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

3.  Constraints on theories of cognitive aging.

Authors:  T A Salthouse
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-09

Review 4.  Implicit learning in aging: extant patterns and new directions.

Authors:  Anna Rieckmann; Lars Bäckman
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 7.444

5.  Input, retention, and output factors affecting adult age differences in visuospatial short-term memory.

Authors:  Alan A Hartley; Deborah M Little; Nicole K Speer; John Jonides
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 6.  Why Is Working Memory Performance Unstable? A Review of 21 Factors.

Authors:  Rachael N Blasiman; Christopher A Was
Journal:  Eur J Psychol       Date:  2018-03-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.