Literature DB >> 7541448

Lenograstim prevents morbidity from intensive induction chemotherapy in the treatment of inflammatory breast cancer.

B Chevallier1, P Chollet, Y Merrouche, H Roche, P Fumoleau, P Kerbrat, J Y Genot, P Fargeot, J P Olivier, C Fizames.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHuG-CSF) versus its inert vehicle in patients with unilateral nonmetastatic inflammatory breast cancer treated with fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide high-dose (FEC-HD) neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty patients have been enrolled by nine French centers in this double-blind, parallel-group, vehicle-controlled study to compare at each cycle subcutaneous lenograstim (5 micrograms/kg/d) with placebo given from day 6 to day 15 after the induction chemotherapy (day 1 to day 4, fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 continuous intravenous [IV] infusion; day 2 to day 4, epirubicin 35 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2 both IV push). Four cycles were planned every 3 weeks before locoregional treatment. Patients with febrile neutropenia remained blinded for the subsequent cycles.
RESULTS: Lenograstim significantly reduced the duration of neutropenia at less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L and less than 1 x 10(9)/L to a median duration of 2 and 3 days, respectively, as compared with 5 and 7 days in the placebo group. This translated into a statistically significant reduced incidence of microbiologically documented infections, and a decreased need for rehospitalizations for infectious events and antibiotic use. Clinical objective tumor response rate observed after four cycles was 89.6% and 93%, respectively, in the placebo and treated groups. Mild transient bone and injection-site pain, myelemia, and hyperleukocytosis were the most frequently reported adverse events associated with lenograstim.
CONCLUSION: Lenograstim is safe and effective to reduce morbidity associated with FEC-HD neoadjuvant chemotherapy in inflammatory breast cancer. Response rate is not affected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7541448     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.7.1564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  26 in total

1.  Impact of ASCO guidelines for the use of hematopoietic colony stimulating factors (CSFs): survey results of fifteen Paris university hospitals.

Authors:  I Debrix; I Madelaine; N Grenet; D Roux; C Bardin; F Le Mercier; J E Fontan; O Connor; A Pointereau; P Tilleul
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-12

Review 2.  Colony-stimulating factors for the management of neutropenia in cancer patients.

Authors:  David C Dale
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Re: personalized medicine and cancer supportive care: appropriate use of colony-stimulating factor support of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Arnold L Potosky; Jennifer L Malin; Benjamin Kim; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Haemopoietic growth factors in paediatric oncology: a review of the literature.

Authors:  L M Wagner; W L Furman
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 5.  Lenograstim: an update of its pharmacological properties and use in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and related clinical settings.

Authors:  C J Dunn; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Treatment of breast cancer with chemotherapy in combination with filgrastim: approaches to improving therapeutic outcome.

Authors:  Giuseppe Frasci
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Lenograstim. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in neutropenia and related clinical settings.

Authors:  J E Frampton; Y E Yarker; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Breast cancer in moroccan young women: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Halima Abahssain; Issam Lalya; Fatima Zahra El M'rabet; Nabil Ismaili; Rachid Razine; Mohammed Adnane Tazi; Hind M'rabti; Omar El Mesbahi; Nourddine Benjaafar; Redouane Abouqal; Hassan Errihani
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-11-08

9.  Gene expression profiles of inflammatory breast cancer: correlation with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and metastasis-free survival.

Authors:  F Bertucci; N T Ueno; P Finetti; P Vermeulen; A Lucci; F M Robertson; M Marsan; T Iwamoto; S Krishnamurthy; H Masuda; P Van Dam; W A Woodward; M Cristofanilli; J M Reuben; L Dirix; P Viens; W F Symmans; D Birnbaum; S J Van Laere
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Can sequential administration minimise the cost of high dose chemotherapy? An economic assessment in inflammatory breast cancer.

Authors:  Patricia Marino; Anne-Gaelle Le Corroller; Thao Palangié; Maud Janvier; Michel Fabbro; Laurent Molinier; Thierry Delozier; Alain Livartowski; Jean-Paul Moatti; Patrice Viens
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.