Literature DB >> 7541357

Potential effects of age-specific reference ranges for serum prostate-specific antigen.

S P Lankford1, K L Peters, R C Elser.   

Abstract

Age-specific reference ranges for serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) may improve this test for detecting prostate cancer. We have analyzed PSA levels from 10,024 men to determine the potential effects of these reference ranges. PSA levels (ng/ml) were grouped by patient age for comparison between standard (all ages: PSA < or = 4.0) and age-specific (< or = 49 years: PSA < or = 2.5; 50-59 years: PSA < or = 3.5; 60-69 years: PSA < or = 4.5; > or = 70 years: PSA < or = 6.5) reference ranges. Serum PSA correlated significantly with age (r = 0.33; p < 0.001). Fewer men > or = 60 years had elevated levels when age-specific reference ranges were applied (1,373 vs. 1,967; p < 0.001). Prostate biopsies and prebiopsy PSA levels from 865 men were reviewed. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated using both reference ranges. A significant increase in specificity with the age-specific reference ranges was seen for men > or = 70 years (58.6 vs. 34.2%; p < 0.001). There was, however, a concomitant decrease in sensitivity (77.6 vs. 91.7%; p < 0.001). We conclude serum PSA increases with age and we support the concept of age-specific reference ranges. However, the specificity of this test remains low, illustrating its limitations for prostate cancer detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7541357     DOI: 10.1159/000475157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  4 in total

1.  Prostate Cancer - Old Problems and New Approaches. (Part II. Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers, Pathology and Biological Aspects).

Authors:  Kenneth V Honn; Amer Aref; Yong Q Chen; Michael L Cher; John D Crissman; Jeffrey D Forman; Xiang Gao; David Grignon; Maha Hussain; Arthur T Porter; Edson J Pontes; Bruce Redman; Wael Sakr; Richard Severson; Dean G Tang; David P Wood
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  An alternative method for Frailty Index cut-off points to define frailty categories.

Authors:  Roman Romero-Ortuno
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 1.710

3.  The value of screening tests for detection of prostate cancer in 1000 saudi men.

Authors:  Baher A Kamal
Journal:  J Family Community Med       Date:  2004-09

Review 4.  The Role and Significance of Bioumoral Markers in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Traian Constantin; Diana Alexandra Savu; Ștefana Bucur; Gabriel Predoiu; Maria Magdalena Constantin; Viorel Jinga
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.