Literature DB >> 7539412

Evidence of a chromatin basis for increased mutagen sensitivity associated with multiple primary malignancies of the head and neck.

T K Pandita1, W N Hittelman.   

Abstract

Individuals at increased risk for cancer development have been reported to exhibit increased mutagen sensitivity as detected by the G2 phase chromosome breakage assay. To better understand the basis for such chromosome sensitivity, we examined 4 lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from 4 head and neck cancer patients, 2 of whom were previously shown to have normal bleomycin sensitivity and 2 high bleomycin sensitivity (and multiple primary tumors). These cell lines were studied for cell survival and initial damage and repair at both the DNA and chromosome levels, and the results compared to a normal control cell line and 3 ataxia telangiectasia homozygote cell lines. While all cell lines exhibited nearly equal levels of initial DNA damage and repair throughout the cell cycle, both the ataxia telangiectasia homozygote cell lines and 2 cell lines derived from individuals with multiple head and neck primary tumors showed increased levels of initial chromosome damage (detected by premature chromosome condensation), a reduced fast repair component and higher residual chromosome damage. Our results suggest that one component of the enhanced mutagen sensitivity phenotype observed in cancer-prone individuals may involve an inherent chromatin alteration that allows a more efficient translation of DNA damage into chromosome damage following mutagen exposure. The degree of such an alteration might then be associated with an increased risk for second primary tumors in other carcinogen-exposed sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7539412     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910610524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  8 in total

1.  Involvement of human MOF in ATM function.

Authors:  Arun Gupta; Girdhar G Sharma; Charles S H Young; Manjula Agarwal; Edwin R Smith; Tanya T Paull; John C Lucchesi; Kum Kum Khanna; Thomas Ludwig; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 2.  Molecular parameters of hyperthermia for radiosensitization.

Authors:  Tej K Pandita; Shruti Pandita; Sukesh R Bhaumik
Journal:  Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.807

Review 3.  Histone modifications and DNA double-strand break repair after exposure to ionizing radiations.

Authors:  Clayton R Hunt; Deepti Ramnarain; Nobuo Horikoshi; Puneeth Iyengar; Raj K Pandita; Jerry W Shay; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 4.  Cell cycle control, checkpoint mechanisms, and genotoxic stress.

Authors:  R E Shackelford; W K Kaufmann; R S Paules
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Deficient DNA repair capacity, a predisposing factor in breast cancer.

Authors:  R Parshad; F M Price; V A Bohr; K H Cowans; J A Zujewski; K K Sanford
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Universal internucleotide statistics in full genomes: a footprint of the DNA structure and packaging?

Authors:  Mikhail I Bogachev; Airat R Kayumov; Armin Bunde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  High γ-radiation sensitivity is associated with increased gastric cancer risk in a Chinese Han population: a case-control analysis.

Authors:  Honglin Dong; Xiaowei Jin; Jie Hu; Haifeng Li; Xianli He; Xiaonan Liu; Guoqiang Bao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Chromatin modifications and the DNA damage response to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Rakesh Kumar; Nobuo Horikoshi; Mayank Singh; Arun Gupta; Hari S Misra; Kevin Albuquerque; Clayton R Hunt; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 6.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.