Literature DB >> 7538082

Prostate-specific antigen detected prostate cancer: pathological characteristics of ultrasound visible versus ultrasound invisible tumors.

J K Ferguson1, D G Bostwick, V Suman, H Zincke, J E Oesterling.   

Abstract

Most studies examining the issue of 'early detection of prostate cancer' advocate the combined use of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination (DRE). As a result, a significant number of new prostate cancers are diagnosed on the basis of an elevated serum PSA when the DRE is unremarkable. The purpose of this study is to determine if the PSA-detected tumors that are visible on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) have the same pathological characteristics as PSA-detected tumors that are invisible on TRUS. One hundred and ninety-four patients with an elevated serum PSA concentration and nonpalpable prostate cancer who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) at our institution between March 1988 and December 1991 were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: 97 (50%) had no identifiable lesion on TRUS, and 97 (50%) had at least one hypoechoic area consistent with adenocarcinoma of the prostate. The pathological characteristics of the RRP specimens from the two groups were compared. There was no significant difference in the age (p = 0.14) or the preoperative serum PSA values (p = 0.18) between the groups. Also, there was no significant difference between the groups with regard to tumor volume (p = 0.89), focality of the cancer (p = 0.43), Gleason score (p = 0.81), DNA ploidy status (p = 0.96), pathological stage (p = 0.92), surgical margin involvement (p = 0.27), and tumor location (p = 0.64). These findings suggest that the clinical TNM staging system for prostate cancer may be simplified by eliminating the distinction between PSA-detected cancers visible on TRUS and PSA detected cancers not visible on TRUS.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7538082     DOI: 10.1159/000475114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  4 in total

1.  [Transrectal ultrasound of the prostate. Current status and prospects].

Authors:  M Zacharias; K V Jenderka; H Heynemann; P Fornara
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Influence of transrectal endosonography on the clinical staging of impalpable prostate cancer. A controversy over the TNM system].

Authors:  P G Hammerer; H Augustin; J Blonski; M Graefen; A Haese; A Erbersdobler; F Daghofer; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Evaluating radical prostatectomy specimens: therapeutic and prognostic importance.

Authors:  D G Bostwick; R Montironi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Ultrasound findings are not useful for defining stage T1c prostate cancer.

Authors:  H Sanders; R el-Galley
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.