Literature DB >> 7534485

Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium on the bone-implant interface shear strength.

K Hayashi1, T Inadome, H Tsumura, Y Nakashima, Y Sugioka.   

Abstract

We have investigated the bone-implant interface shear strength of hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated Ti-6Al-4V (HA-coating A) (roughness average, Ra = 3.4 +/- 0.5 microns) and HA-coated Ti-6Al-4V with a rougher surface (HA-coating B) (Ra = 8.4 +/- 1.8 microns). There was no significant difference between HA-coating A and HA-coating B implants with respect to the bone-implant interface shear strength as determined in push-out tests using the transcortical model in adult dogs. The bone-implant interface shear strength of bead-coated porous Ti-6Al-4V was significantly greater than that of both HA-coating A and HA-coating B implants. The failure site, as determined by scanning electron microscopy, was the coating-substrate interface, not the coating-bone interface. This indicates a need to protect the HA coating from the direct shear forces. HA coating enhances early bone growth into the porous surface of the implant. Long-term fixation should depend on bone anchoring to this porous surface. Hydroxyapatite coatings must be developed which do not obstruct the pores of the surface of the implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7534485     DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(94)90241-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  9 in total

Review 1.  Biological nano-functionalization of titanium-based biomaterial surfaces: a flexible toolbox.

Authors:  René Beutner; Jan Michael; Bernd Schwenzer; Dieter Scharnweber
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Surface modification of titanium by hydrothermal treatment in Mg-containing solution and early osteoblast responses.

Authors:  Xingling Shi; Masaharu Nakagawa; Giichiro Kawachi; Lingli Xu; Kunio Ishikawa
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Is the bone-bonding ability of a cementless total hip prosthesis enhanced by alkaline and heat treatments?

Authors:  Kazutaka So; Ayumi Kaneuji; Tadami Matsumoto; Shuichi Matsuda; Haruhiko Akiyama
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Fixation of carbon fibre-reinforced carbon composite implanted into bone.

Authors:  M Lewandowska-Szumieł; J Komender; A Górecki; M Kowalski
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 5.  Dental implant systems.

Authors:  Yoshiki Oshida; Elif B Tuna; Oya Aktören; Koray Gençay
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Numerical simulation of in vivo intraosseous torsional failure of a hollow-screw oral implant.

Authors:  Murat Cehreli; Murat Akkocaoglu; Kivanc Akca
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2006-11-04       Impact factor: 2.151

7.  Bone ongrowth and mechanical fixation of implants in cortical and cancellous bone.

Authors:  William Robert Walsh; Matthew Henry Pelletier; Nicky Bertollo; Vedran Lovric; Tian Wang; Per Morberg; William Chase Harington Parr; Dario Bergadano
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  The rehabilitation of posterior atrophic maxilla by using the graftless option of short implant versus conventional long implant with sinus graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Sachin Haribhau Chaware; Vrushali Thakare; Ritu Chaudhary; Ajit Jankar; Smruti Thakkar; Sidesh Borse
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar

9.  In-Vitro Phenotypic Response of Human Osteoblasts to Different Degrees of Titanium Surface Roughness.

Authors:  Muataz A Osman; Rasha A Alamoush; Evgeny Kushnerev; Kevin G Seymour; Susan Shawcross; Julian M Yates
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.