Literature DB >> 7534448

The advantages of using triple-marker screening for chromosomal abnormalities.

L H Kellner1, R R Weiss, Z Weiner, M Neuer, G M Martin, H Schulman, S Lipper.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to assess the utility of triple-marker serum screening for chromosomal abnormalities. STUDY
DESIGN: Our laboratory received 10,605 samples that were between 15 and 22 weeks' gestation for maternal serum screening of chromosomal abnormalities. Triple-marker maternal serum screening consisted of alpha-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, and unconjugated estriol in conjunction with maternal age. Women > or = 35 years old were first offered amniocentesis. If they refused amniocentesis, they were offered the screening test. A second-trimester risk for trisomy 21 > or = 1:270 was considered screen positive. Patients were screen positive for trisomy 18 if all three markers were low: alpha-fetoprotein < or = 0.75 multiples of the median, unconjugated estriol < or = 0.60 multiples of the median, and human chorionic gonadotropin < or = 0.55 multiples of the median.
RESULTS: The initial screen-positive rate was 8.3% (880 women); amniocentesis was offered to 766 (7.2%). Twelve of 16 ascertained cases of trisomy 21 (75%), two of three cases of trisomy 18 (67%), five cases of 45,X karyotype, and one case each of 45,X/46,XX, 47,XXY, 47,XYY, 46,XX,ins(2)(q21p13p15)mat, and 69,XXX karyotypes were identified in the screen-positive patients. All four known cases of trisomy 21 in the 886 women > or = 35 years old who were screened were detected, with a 21% false-positive rate. Omitting unconjugated estriol from our screening program would have resulted in detecting nine of 16 trisomy 21 and six of 12 other chromosomal abnormalities. The false-positive rate would have remained the same.
CONCLUSION: In our sample cohort addition of unconjugated estriol to the screening program resulted in an increased detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities with no change in the false-positive rate. Considering the advancement in screening for chromosomal abnormalities, maternal age alone as an indication for amniocentesis should be reevaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7534448     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90007-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

1.  Attitudes toward maternal serum screening in Chinese women with positive results.

Authors:  Sheau-Wen Jan; Chih-Ping Chen; Lian-Hua Huang; Fu-Yuan Huang; Chung-Chi Lan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Down's syndrome screening: a controversial test, with more controversy to come!

Authors:  T M Reynolds
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  First trimester ultrasound tests alone or in combination with first trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-15

Review 4.  First and second trimester serum tests with and without first trimester ultrasound tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-15

5.  Six year survey of screening for Down's syndrome by maternal age and mid-trimester ultrasound scans.

Authors:  D T Howe; R Gornall; D Wellesley; T Boyle; J Barber
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-04

Review 6.  Second trimester serum tests for Down's Syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Jonathan J Deeks; Boliang Guo; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

Review 7.  First trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-30

Review 8.  Urine tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Boliang Guo; Yemisi Takwoingi; Mary Pennant; Susanna Wisniewski; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-10

Review 9.  Beyond Trisomy 21: Additional Chromosomal Anomalies Detected through Routine Aneuploidy Screening.

Authors:  Amy Metcalfe; Catriona Hippman; Melanie Pastuck; Jo-Ann Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.