Literature DB >> 7534163

Filgrastim post-chemotherapy mobilizes more CD34+ cells with a different antigenic profile compared with use during steady-state hematopoiesis.

R Möhle1, M Pförsich, S Fruehauf, B Witt, A Krämer, R Haas.   

Abstract

For the mobilization of CD34+ peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) filgrastim (R-metHuG-CSF) can be administered either during steady-state hematopoiesis or following cytotoxic chemotherapy. We compared both mobilization modalities intra-individually in seven patients with breast cancer. The number of circulating CD34+ cells was increased after filgrastim-supported chemotherapy compared with filgrastim administration during steady-state (on average, 129 vs. 19/microliters), resulting in a sevenfold higher yield of CD34+ cells per leukapheresis (5.73 vs. 0.79 x 10(6)/kg bodyweight). CD34+ PBPC harvested post-chemotherapy comprised a smaller proportion of early progenitor cells (CD34+/HLA-DR- or CD34+/CD38-) compared with filgrastim treatment alone. However, the absolute number of these early progenitor cells harvested was fivefold higher. The filgrastim-supported rebound after chemotherapy was characterized by a greater proportion of CD34+/CD33+ cells. Correspondingly, CD34+ PBPC mobilized post-chemotherapy contained a higher proportion of CFU-GM compared with filgrastim treatment during steady-state, while the cloning efficiency of CD34+ cells for BFU-E tended to be lower. Of note, the proportion of CD34+/CD19+ lymphoid progenitor and B cells was reduced after chemotherapy. In cancer patients, filgrastim mobilizes higher numbers of CD34+ cells when administered post-chemotherapy, compensating for the smaller proportion of early hematopoietic progenitors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7534163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  3 in total

Review 1.  Targeting stem cell niches and trafficking for cardiovascular therapy.

Authors:  Nicolle Kränkel; Gaia Spinetti; Silvia Amadesi; Paolo Madeddu
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 12.310

2.  Uptake of carbon nanodots into human AML cells in comparison to primary hematopoietic cells.

Authors:  Cathrin Nollmann; Christian Wimmenauer; Stefan Fasbender; Saskia Mayer; Ron-Patrick Caddedu; Paul Jäger; Thomas Heinzel; Rainer Haas
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  High-dose versus low-dose cyclophosphamide in combination with G-CSF for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization.

Authors:  Jin Seok Ahn; Seonyang Park; Seock-Ah Im; Sung-Soo Yoon; Jong-Seok Lee; Byoung Kook Kim; Soo-Mee Bang; Eun Kyung Cho; Jae Hoon Lee; Chul Won Jung; Hugh Chul Kim; Chu Myung Seong; Moon Hee Lee; Chul Soo Kim; Keun Seok Lee; Jung Ae Lee; Myung-Ju Ahn
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.884

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.