Literature DB >> 7534059

Aggressive surgical resection for cholangiocarcinoma.

W K Washburn1, W D Lewis, R L Jenkins.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To review the spectrum of cholangiocarcinoma in patients treated by a single team of hepatobiliary surgeons over an 8-year period, to evaluate the predictors of survival, and to assess the results of an aggressive approach to surgical resection.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of all clinical records of patients referred for treatment of cholangiocarcinoma, with univariate analysis of clinical and pathologic factors in relation to patient survival.
SETTING: New England Deaconess Hospital, Boston, Mass. PATIENTS: Eighty-eight consecutive patients referred with the established diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma, from December 31, 1985, to April 15, 1994.
INTERVENTIONS: Seventy-five of 88 patients were treated surgically, with 59 undergoing major resection for cure. Of the 29 patients treated palliatively, 16 had operations and 13 had wire mesh stents placed nonoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidity, mortality, and patient survival.
RESULTS: Survival correlates directly with the pathologic stage (TNM). Tumor location had no impact on survival. Patients undergoing resection survived significantly longer (median, 23.2 months) than palliated patients (median, 7.7 months; P = .0015). Nonoperative palliation resulted in better survival than surgical palliation (P = .045). Major hepatic resection was used alone in eight patients with predominating intrahepatic lesions, while 18 patients with hilar lesions underwent en bloc skeletonization in conjunction with major hepatic resection. Resection with microscopically free margins significantly improved survival. Only patients undergoing major resection enjoyed survival greater than 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient survival can be significantly improved by aggressive surgical resection. Hepatic resection should be used aggressively to achieve disease-free margins to optimize survival. Hepatic resection can be performed with low morbidity and mortality. Liver transplantation should be avoided as a treatment for cholangiocarcinoma. The best palliation for unresectable disease remains debatable. We advocate nonoperative treatment with endobiliary expandable wire mesh stents for patients with unresectable disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7534059     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430030040006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  46 in total

1.  Indications for referral and assessment in adult liver transplantation: a clinical guideline. British Society of Gastroenterology.

Authors:  J Devlin; J O'Grady
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of an American and a Japanese experience.

Authors:  J I Tsao; Y Nimura; J Kamiya; N Hayakawa; S Kondo; M Nagino; M Miyachi; M Kanai; K Uesaka; K Oda; R L Rossi; J W Braasch; J M Dugan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Role of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase mRNA in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yuji Morine; Mitsuo Shimada; Tohru Utsunomiya; Satoru Imura; Tetsuya Ikemoto; Jun Hanaka; Mami Kanamoto; Nobuhiro Kurita; Hidenori Miyake
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Pancreatoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Murakami; Kenichiro Uemura; Yasuo Hayashidani; Takeshi Sudo; Hiroki Ohge; Taijiro Sueda
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Trans-peritoneal fine needle aspiration biopsy of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is associated with disease dissemination.

Authors:  Julie K Heimbach; William Sanchez; Charles B Rosen; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Surgical palliation for unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  S Connor; S J Wigmore; K K Madhavan; R W Parks; O J Garden
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 7.  Advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of cholangiocarcinoma: 1990-2009.

Authors:  Murad Aljiffry; Mark J Walsh; Michele Molinari
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Liver transplantation for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ricardo Robles; Francisco Sánchez-Bueno; Pablo Ramírez; Roberto Brusadin; Pascual Parrilla
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Initial presentation and management of hilar and peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: is a node-positive status or potential margin-positive result a contraindication to resection?

Authors:  Kevin Tri Nguyen; Jennifer Steel; Tsafrir Vanounou; Allan Tsung; J Wallis Marsh; David A Geller; T Clark Gamblin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Characterization and growth regulation of a rat intrahepatic bile duct epithelial cell line under hormonally defined, serum-free conditions.

Authors:  P C de Groen; B Vroman; K Laakso; N F LaRusso
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.