Literature DB >> 7532980

Magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: update.

A Maio1, M D Rifkin.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in the world, the most frequently diagnosed in the United States, and the second most lethal cancer in U.S. men. Earlier diagnosis implies better prognosis. However, prognosis may be dependent upon the stage of the malignancy at the time of diagnosis and implementation of appropriate therapy. Clinical staging, even with the development of serum prostate-specific antigen and other studies, has not proven to be highly accurate, particularly to identify and quantitate local disease and extension. Imaging has, in the past, also had limited success. With the development of computed tomography (CT), endorectal ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), there was great expectations for improvement. However, CT and ultrasound have not been as accurate as hoped. MRI, because of its multiorientation and multiparameter abilities, has been the most definitive imaging tool for staging of local extension, yet still has limitations. The prostate capsule, the neurovascular bundles, the seminal vesicle, and other regions prone to initial attack by cancer extension can be seen exquisitely clearly by the newer approaches to MRI. Cancer extension, however, cannot be consistently identified when it is microscopic. MRI is an accurate identifier of macroscopic, even subtle macroscopic disease, but there are still limitations in its ability to diagnose all pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7532980     DOI: 10.1097/00002142-199500710-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0899-3459


  3 in total

1.  Central gland and peripheral zone prostate tumors have significantly different quantitative imaging signatures on 3 Tesla endorectal, in vivo T2-weighted MR imagery.

Authors:  Satish E Viswanath; Nicholas B Bloch; Jonathan C Chappelow; Robert Toth; Neil M Rofsky; Elizabeth M Genega; Robert E Lenkinski; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Bombesin functionalized gold nanoparticles show in vitro and in vivo cancer receptor specificity.

Authors:  Nripen Chanda; Vijaya Kattumuri; Ravi Shukla; Ajit Zambre; Kavita Katti; Anandhi Upendran; Rajesh R Kulkarni; Para Kan; Genevieve M Fent; Stan W Casteel; C Jeffrey Smith; Evan Boote; J David Robertson; Cathy Cutler; John R Lever; Kattesh V Katti; Raghuraman Kannan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  MR Spectroscopic Imaging of Peripheral Zone in Prostate Cancer Using a 3T MRI Scanner: Endorectal versus External Phased Array Coils.

Authors:  Rajakumar Nagarajan; Daniel Ja Margolis; Steven S Raman; David Ouellette; Manoj K Sarma; Robert E Reiter; M Albert Thomas
Journal:  Magn Reson Insights       Date:  2013-05-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.