Literature DB >> 7532929

Significance of the tumour markers CA 125 II, CA 72-4, CASA and CYFRA 21-1 in ovarian carcinoma.

U Hasholzner1, L Baumgartner, P Stieber, W Meier, K Hofmann, A Fateh-Moghadam.   

Abstract

We compared the tumour marker CA 72-4 and the new markers CASA and CYFRA 21-1 with the established marker CA 125II in follow-up care and control of efficacy of treatment in ovarian cancer in order to determine whether there are differences in recognizing ovarian carcinomas of different histological type. The investigation was done retrospectively on serum samples frozen at -80 degrees C obtained from 262 subjects, among them 50 healthy women, 53 sera with benign gynecological diseases and 159 sera with ovarian cancer, 72 of them at the time of primary diagnosis. We used commercially available kits: CA 125 II: Centocor RIA, CASA: Medac EIA, CA 72-4: Centocor RIA and CYFRA 21-1: Boehringer EnzymunR ELISA. Fixing specificity at 95% versus benign gynecological diseases as a clinically relevant reference group, we found cut-off values of 160 U/mL for CA 125II, 6.5 U/mL for CASA, 6.8 U/mL for CA 72-4 and 2.4 ng/ml for CYFRA 21-1. Based on this specificity we can compare the corresponding sensitivities at the time of primary diagnosis (n = 72): CA 125 II 47%, CA 72-4 47%; CASA 31% and CYFRA 21-1 44%. Regarding histological types of ovarian carcinomas, we found a sensitivity of 50% for CA 125 II and CASA, 36% for CA 72-4 and 33% for CYFRA 21-1 in serous ovarian cancer (n = 53), 21% for CA 125 II and CASA, 36% for CYFRA 21-1 and 43% for CA 72-4 for mucinous ovarian cancer (n = 27). Serous ovarian carcinomas were classified by higher FIGO-stages than mucinous ovarian carcinomas. Additional sensitivities were found at the time of primary diagnosis for the combination of CA 125 II and CA 72-4 and in serous ovarian cancer for CA 125 II and CASA. According to our results, at the time of primary diagnosis the combined determination of CA 125 II and CA 72-4 is useful. If both are negative, determination of CASA can be helpful. For follow-up care and control of efficacy of treatment the preoperative positive or leading marker is sufficient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7532929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  5 in total

1.  Development of a multimarker assay for early detection of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Zoya Yurkovetsky; Steven Skates; Aleksey Lomakin; Brian Nolen; Trenton Pulsipher; Francesmary Modugno; Jeffrey Marks; Andrew Godwin; Elieser Gorelik; Ian Jacobs; Usha Menon; Karen Lu; Donna Badgwell; Robert C Bast; Anna E Lokshin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Early detection of ovarian cancer: new technologies in pursuit of a disease that is neither common nor rare.

Authors:  Robert C Bast
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2004

3.  The role of chemotherapy and prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy in a case of colorectal adenocarcinoma with ovarian metastases.

Authors:  E K Shin; B T Takizawa; L Masters; S Shahabi
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

4.  A list of candidate cancer biomarkers for targeted proteomics.

Authors:  Malu Polanski; N Leigh Anderson
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2007-02-07

5.  Serial Patterns of Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers in a Prediagnosis Longitudinal Dataset.

Authors:  Oleg Blyuss; Alex Gentry-Maharaj; Evangelia-Orania Fourkala; Andy Ryan; Alexey Zaikin; Usha Menon; Ian Jacobs; John F Timms
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.