Literature DB >> 7532921

Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in stool specimens from infants and young children in field studies.

R Dagan1, D Fraser, J El-On, I Kassis, R Deckelbaum, S Turner.   

Abstract

Diagnosis of Cryptosporidium is made by the identification of oocysts in stool specimens. Screening in field studies relies mainly on acid-fast staining followed by microscopic examination. The more sensitive immunofluorescent antibody (IFA) staining method is time-consuming, may involve technical difficulties, and is extremely costly as a screening procedure in field studies. We evaluated the diagnostic utility of a commercially available enzyme immunoassay (EIA), which detects Cryptosporidium-specific antigen, in 204 unprocessed stool specimens obtained from patients less than three years of age from a field study in southern Israel. When compared with the routine screening procedure applied in this field study (screening by acid-fast staining and microscopy after concentration, and confirmation of positive results by IFA), both the sensitivity and specificity were 98%. Of 139 specimens negative by microscopy, 13 (9.3%) were positive by the EIA. Eleven of these were confirmed by inhibition with antibody to Cryptosporidia-specific antigen. The EIA is an important tool for identifying Cryptosporidium in fecal specimens in field studies since it is sensitive, specific, simple to use, and unaffected by the presence of a preservative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7532921     DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1995.52.134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg        ISSN: 0002-9637            Impact factor:   2.345


  7 in total

1.  False-positive results obtained with the Alexon ProSpecT Cryptosporidium enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  K M Doing; J L Hamm; J A Jellison; J A Marquis; C Kingsbury
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Cryptosporidiosis: comparison of three diagnostic methods and effects of storage temperature on detectability of cryptosporidia in cattle faeces.

Authors:  Yvonne Kuhnert-Paul; Berit Bangoura; Katja Dittmar; Arwid Daugschies; Ronald Schmäschke
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 3.  Recognition and prevention of hospital-associated enteric infections in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Linda D Bobo; Erik R Dubberke
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Molecular analysis of the 18S rRNA gene of Cryptosporidium serpentis in a wild-caught corn snake (Elaphe guttata guttata) and a five-species restriction fragment length polymorphism- based assay that can additionally discern C. parvum from C. wrairi.

Authors:  L M Kimbell; D L Miller; W Chavez; N Altman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Waterborne protozoan pathogens.

Authors:  M M Marshall; D Naumovitz; Y Ortega; C R Sterling
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Does co-infection with Giardia lamblia modulate the clinical characteristics of enteric infections in young children?

Authors:  Natalya Bilenko; Amalya Levy; Ron Dagan; Richard J Deckelbaum; Yossef El-On; Drora Fraser
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Oligonucleotide-gold nanoparticle networks for detection of Cryptosporidium parvum heat shock protein 70 mRNA.

Authors:  David J Javier; Alejandro Castellanos-Gonzalez; Shannon E Weigum; A Clinton White; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.948

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.