PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel administered as a 96-hour infusion to patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHLs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had relapsed NHL and measurable disease and were considered incurable. Paclitaxel was infused at a dose of 140 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Premedications to prevent paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions were not administered and no patients received corticosteroids. Expression of the multidrug resistance (mdr-1) gene was determined in tumor from 17 patients by mRNA quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: Thirty-one patients received a total of 99 cycles of paclitaxel. Two patients were not assessable for response. The median age was 50 years, 71% had stage IV disease, and intermediate/high-grade histology was present in 65% of patients. Patients had received a median of three prior chemotherapy regimens, and 68% of patients had responded to the previous chemotherapy (chemotherapy-sensitive). Of 29 assessable patients, five (17%) achieved a partial response (PR). With a median potential follow-up time of 17 months, the median event-free and overall survival durations were 1.6 and 7.5 months, respectively. No correlation was found between response to paclitaxel and extent of prior treatment or response. The mdr-1 gene was easily detectable in 14 of 17 tumor biopsies, but was low in all but one sample. The most serious toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia, which occurred during 14% of cycles. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel was well tolerated, but had a low response rate in patients with relapsed NHLs. There was no clear association between response to paclitaxel and extent of our response to prior treatment. Most patients had chemotherapy-sensitive disease, which suggests that the low response rate to paclitaxel was probably not due to general chemotherapy resistance. Paclitaxel provided good palliation in a minority of patients and is a reasonable agent to consider for use in patients who have failed to respond to standard chemotherapy.
PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel administered as a 96-hour infusion to patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHLs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had relapsed NHL and measurable disease and were considered incurable. Paclitaxel was infused at a dose of 140 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Premedications to prevent paclitaxelhypersensitivity reactions were not administered and no patients received corticosteroids. Expression of the multidrug resistance (mdr-1) gene was determined in tumor from 17 patients by mRNA quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: Thirty-one patients received a total of 99 cycles of paclitaxel. Two patients were not assessable for response. The median age was 50 years, 71% had stage IV disease, and intermediate/high-grade histology was present in 65% of patients. Patients had received a median of three prior chemotherapy regimens, and 68% of patients had responded to the previous chemotherapy (chemotherapy-sensitive). Of 29 assessable patients, five (17%) achieved a partial response (PR). With a median potential follow-up time of 17 months, the median event-free and overall survival durations were 1.6 and 7.5 months, respectively. No correlation was found between response to paclitaxel and extent of prior treatment or response. The mdr-1 gene was easily detectable in 14 of 17 tumor biopsies, but was low in all but one sample. The most serious toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia, which occurred during 14% of cycles. CONCLUSION:Paclitaxel was well tolerated, but had a low response rate in patients with relapsed NHLs. There was no clear association between response to paclitaxel and extent of our response to prior treatment. Most patients had chemotherapy-sensitive disease, which suggests that the low response rate to paclitaxel was probably not due to general chemotherapy resistance. Paclitaxel provided good palliation in a minority of patients and is a reasonable agent to consider for use in patients who have failed to respond to standard chemotherapy.
Authors: Wenqing Qi; Laurence S Cooke; Xiaobing Liu; Lisa Rimsza; Denise J Roe; Ann Manziolli; Daniel O Persky; Thomas P Miller; Daruka Mahadevan Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 5.858
Authors: Jane E Churpek; Barbara Pro; Koen van Besien; Justin Kline; Kathy Conner; James L Wade; Fredrick Hagemeister; Theodore Karrison; Sonali M Smith Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-01-10 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: A P Rapoport; B Meisenberg; C Sarkodee-Adoo; A Fassas; S R Frankel; B Mookerjee; N Takebe; R Fenton; M Heyman; A Badros; A Kennedy; M Jacobs; R Hudes; K Ruehle; R Smith; L Kight; S Chambers; M MacFadden; M Cottler-Fox; T Chen; G Phillips; G Tricot Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 5.483