Literature DB >> 7530252

Evaluation of three new hydrocolloid dressings: retention of dressing integrity and biodegradability of absorbent components attenuate inflammation.

D Chakravarthy1, N Rodway, S Schmidt, D Smith, M Evancho, R Sims.   

Abstract

Residues from hydrocolloid dressings (HCDs) that originate from matrix disintegration and nonbiodegradability of the absorbent components, may cause deep-seated, unresolved inflammation in tissue that appears otherwise healed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate three new HCDs that were formulated with the goal of attenuating the inflammatory responses that may arise from HCD therapy. Two of the HCDs (A-106 and A-107) consisted of conventional absorbents dispersed in a new maceration-resistant adhesive matrix. The same matrix, mixed with potentially biodegradable dextran microspheres, formed the third dressing (Dextran Bead Dressing [DBD]). In this pilot scale study these novel dressings were evaluated on full-thickness dermal wounds on swine. Restore (Hollister) and DuoDERM CGF (Convatec) dressings were used as controls. Wound healing was evaluated histomorphometrically. Pertinent histologic parameters were ranked from wound tissue that was harvested 18 days after wounding. Grossly visible dressing disintegration ranged from minimal (DBD) to severe (Restore). Disintegration of other dressings was moderate. The percentage of tissue sections exhibiting giant cells reflected, in parallel, the observed extent of dressing disintegration. Thirty-eight percent of wounds dressed with DBD contained giant cells; 74 and 100% of wounds treated with DuoDERM CGF and Restore, respectively, contained giant cells. DBD-dressed wounds had relatively fewer chronic inflammatory cells than other dressings. These wounds were also characterized by a well-organized collagen matrix and complete reepithelialization. The extent of wound closures was similar for all dressing types except Restore. Closure of Restore-dressed wounds was delayed compared with closure with DBD and DuoDERM CGF on all days of evaluation except one. A-106 and A-107 were comparable to DuoDERM CGF in retention of dressing integrity and the elicited inflammatory tissue response. The DBD dressing appears to possess equivalent properties of typical HCDs while causing minimal tissue reactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7530252     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820281007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  3 in total

1.  Fluid Handling Dynamics and Durability of Silver-Containing Gelling Fiber Dressings Tested in a Robotic Wound System.

Authors:  Aleksei Orlov; Adi Lustig; Angela Grigatti; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  The performance of gelling fibre wound dressings under clinically relevant robotic laboratory tests.

Authors:  Adi Lustig; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.099

3.  Effects of honeybee (Apis mellifera) venom on keratinocyte migration in vitro.

Authors:  Sang Mi Han; Kwan Kyu Park; Young Mee Nicholls; Nicola Macfarlane; Greig Duncan
Journal:  Pharmacogn Mag       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.085

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.