Literature DB >> 7529857

The most promising surrogate endpoint biomarkers for screening candidate chemopreventive compounds for prostatic adenocarcinoma in short-term phase II clinical trials.

D G Bostwick1, H B Burke, T M Wheeler, L W Chung, R Bookstein, T G Pretlow, R B Nagle, R Montironi, M M Lieber, R W Veltri.   

Abstract

Surrogate endpoint biomarkers (SEBs) are needed in clinical chemoprevention trials to avoid the excessively long study periods and high costs associated with the use of cancer incidence reduction as an endpoint, particularly with relatively slow-growing tumors such as prostatic adenocarcinoma. SEBs should be directly associated with the evolution of neoplasia, and develop with high frequency in abnormal cells of susceptible individuals. If SEBs can be modified by a particular intervention regimen in short-term studies, the rationale for carrying out long-term studies may be strengthened. The consensus panel identified a small and manageable group of biomarkers measured in tissue or serum as the most promising in prostate cancer chemoprevention, including (1) prostate specific antigen (PSA); (2) morphometric markers, such as nuclear size and roundness; (3) proliferation markers, such as MIB-1 and PCNA; (4) nuclear DNA content (ploidy); (5) oncogene c-erbB-2 (HER-2/neu) expression; (6) angiogenesis; and (7) high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN). Information regarding many of these and other biomarkers is limited, calling for further investigation. Also, these factors, chosen chiefly for their proven or proposed utility as prognostic factors, may be less useful as SEBs. It was agreed that concurrent study of numerous markers rather than single markers allows comparison of their relative utility, including assessment of ease of quantitation and the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7529857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biochem Suppl        ISSN: 0733-1959


  7 in total

Review 1.  High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is a disease.

Authors:  M S Steiner
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Precursor lesions for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M R Feneley; C Busch
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Chemoprevention strategies in the prostate: an overview.

Authors:  Gary J Kelloff; Howard R Higley; Michael K Brawer; M Scott Lucia; Caroline C Sigman; E David Crawford
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

Review 4.  High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer risk reduction.

Authors:  Mitchell S Steiner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-02-21       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Dietary terpenoids and prostate cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  Thangaiyan Rabi; Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2008-05-01

6.  Short-term cellular effects induced by castration therapy in relation to clinical outcome in prostate cancer.

Authors:  P Stattin; P Westin; J E Damber; A Bergh
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 7.  Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  D G Bostwick
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.862

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.