Literature DB >> 7529696

The problem of bimanual coupling: a reaction time study of simple unimanual and bimanual finger responses.

P Kaluzny1, A Palmeri, M Wiesendanger.   

Abstract

The properties of the sensorimotor system controlling finger movements were investigated in the simple uni- and bimanual reaction time (RT) paradigm, with emphasis on the problem of interhemispheric transfer of sensory and motor information. Unimanual and bimanual responses of the index fingers were elicited by stimulation of either left or right hand and resulting reaction times were compared to assess the degree of right-left differences and thus also of crossed-uncrossed differences (CUD). The response consisted of a force pulse (first dorsal interosseus muscle) which was elicited by a non-painful electrical stimulus applied to the base of the middle finger. In unimanual experiments, the population analysis showed that RTs obtained with contralateral stimuli were significantly longer (6 msec) than RTs elicited with ipsilateral stimuli. However, inter-subject differences were large and sometimes pointed in the non-expected direction (crossed < uncrossed). Statistically significant right-left differences in RT were detected in the bimanual response paradigm, but these differences occurred in both directions with the crossed RT either longer or shorter than uncrossed RT. The analysis of the correlation structure of bimanual RT suggested the presence of stimulus-related asymmetries of the hands. These observations provide some support for the notion of an additional processing time related to interhemispheric transmission of sensory and/or motor signals. In addition, it turned out that factors other than callosal transmission can also produce asymmetries in RTs of the two hands. Thus some subjects had consistent right-left differences which were unrelated to callosal transmission. Asymmetries were also introduced by changing the stimulation side. In the light of this multi-factorial influence, we argue that the underlying mechanisms leading to intermanual asymmetries in RT cannot be attributed exclusively to callosal transmission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7529696     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(94)90153-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  6 in total

1.  Visual and tactile interhemispheric transfer compared with the method of Poffenberger.

Authors:  Robert Fendrich; Jeffrey J Hutsler; Michael S Gazzaniga
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Proprioceptive reaction times and long-latency reflexes in humans.

Authors:  C D Manning; S A Tolhurst; P Bawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Motor performance of tongue with a computer-integrated system under different levels of background physical exertion.

Authors:  Xueliang Huo; Ashley N Johnson-Long; Maysam Ghovanloo; Minoru Shinohara
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Dual-task motor performance with a tongue-operated assistive technology compared with hand operations.

Authors:  Ashley N Johnson; Xueliang Huo; Maysam Ghovanloo; Minoru Shinohara
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Inter-hemispheric integration of tactile-motor responses across body parts.

Authors:  Luigi Tamè; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Relative performance of the two hands in simple and choice reaction time tasks.

Authors:  M Nisiyama; L E Ribeiro-do-Valle
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 2.590

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.