Literature DB >> 7529428

The TNM system of 1992. Comments from the TNM working group. Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Prognostic Parameters in Localized Prostate Cancer. Stockholm, Sweden, May 12-13, 1993.

G D Chisholm1, P O Hedlund, J Adolfsson, L J Denis, S Friberg, J E Johansson, B Peeling.   

Abstract

The TNM working group acknowledges the multinational agreement reached in the 1992 TNM classification, but nevertheless gives some suggestions for modifications. The main interest of the group has been to evaluate parameters suitable for further ramification of the system. The group found that parameters such as DNA ploidy, PSA, nuclear roundness factor, are not yet ready for this purpose. Grade is an established parameter and should be incorporated into the TNM-categories of localized disease. In metastatic disease a number of parameters are available to subdivide this category according to prognosis, and these will be more uniformly and extensively studied in the several large trials that are now in progress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7529428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl        ISSN: 0300-8886


  1 in total

1.  Prediction of treatment response in head and neck cancer by magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Tedros Bezabeh; Olva Odlum; Richard Nason; Paul Kerr; Donna Sutherland; Rakesh Patel; Ian C P Smith
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.