Literature DB >> 7526963

Olivary projecting neurons in the nucleus of Darkschewitsch in the cat receive excitatory monosynaptic input from the cerebellar nuclei.

C I De Zeeuw1, T J Ruigrok.   

Abstract

The direct projection from the cerebellar nuclei to the inferior olive is GABAergic. In the present study, we investigated the projection from the cerebellar nuclei to the mesodiencephalic junction which is known to provide an excitatory projection to the inferior olive. The mesodiencephalic junction was studied in cat following anterograde transport of wheatgerm agglutinated horseradish peroxidase from the cerebellar nuclei in combination with: (1) retrograde transport of gold-lectin conjugate from the inferior olive; and (2) postembedding GABA-immunocytochemistry. Light microscopic analysis revealed that overlap of the anterograde and retrograde labeling was especially prominent in the nucleus of Darkschewitsch. Electron microscopic examination of this area showed: (1) that many cerebellar terminals made synaptic contacts with neurons that project to the inferior olive; (2) that virtually all cerebellar terminals were non-GABAergic and displayed an excitatory morphology; and (3) olivary projecting neurons were non-GABAergic. It is concluded that the indirect cerebellar projection to the inferior olive via the nucleus of Darkschewitsch is disynaptic and excitatory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7526963     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)90411-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  12 in total

Review 1.  Time windows and reverberating loops: a reverse-engineering approach to cerebellar function.

Authors:  Werner M Kistler; Chris I De Zeeuw
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Mesodiencephalic junction GABAergic inputs are processed separately from motor cortical inputs in the basilar pons.

Authors:  Ayoub J Khalil; Huibert D Mansvelder; Laurens Witter
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-06-18

3.  Local changes in the excitability of the cerebellar cortex produce spatially restricted changes in complex spike synchrony.

Authors:  Sarah P Marshall; Eric J Lang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Cerebellar control of the inferior olive.

Authors:  Fredrik Bengtsson; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.648

Review 5.  Visuomotor cerebellum in human and nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Jan Voogd; Caroline K L Schraa-Tam; Jos N van der Geest; Chris I De Zeeuw
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Collateralization of cerebellar output to functionally distinct brainstem areas. A retrograde, non-fluorescent tracing study in the rat.

Authors:  Tom J H Ruigrok; Thea M Teune
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-21

7.  Changes in complex spike activity during classical conditioning.

Authors:  Anders Rasmussen; Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Daniel Z Wetmore; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.492

8.  Transient dynamics and rhythm coordination of inferior olive spatio-temporal patterns.

Authors:  Roberto Latorre; Carlos Aguirre; Mikhail I Rabinovich; Pablo Varona
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.492

9.  Caveats in Transneuronal Tracing with Unmodified Rabies Virus: An Evaluation of Aberrant Results Using a Nearly Perfect Tracing Technique.

Authors:  Tom J H Ruigrok; Sven van Touw; Patrice Coulon
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.492

10.  Excitatory Cerebellar Nucleocortical Circuit Provides Internal Amplification during Associative Conditioning.

Authors:  Zhenyu Gao; Martina Proietti-Onori; Zhanmin Lin; Michiel M Ten Brinke; Henk-Jan Boele; Jan-Willem Potters; Tom J H Ruigrok; Freek E Hoebeek; Chris I De Zeeuw
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.