Literature DB >> 7524237

Utility of preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen concentration and biopsy Gleason score in predicting risk of pelvic lymph node metastases in prostate cancer.

P Narayan1, G Fournier, V Gajendran, R Leidich, R Lo, J S Wolf, G Jacob, G Nicolaisen, K Palmer, F Freiha.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of the preoperative serum concentration of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) plus the Gleason pathology score of biopsy specimens in predicting the presence of disease in the pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer.
METHODS: The medical records of all patients treated for prostate cancer at eight medical centers from January 1988 to June 1993 were reviewed. There were 932 patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer for whom all relevant data were available who had undergone pelvic lymphadenectomy with (n = 912) or without (n = 20) radical prostatectomy. The rate of false-negative predictions of metastases based on combined preoperative biopsy Gleason score and serum PSA concentration was analyzed. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the value of preoperative serum PSA and biopsy Gleason scores individually and in combination in predicting pelvic lymph node metastases.
RESULTS: The false-negative rate of metastases was 0% for preoperative PSA concentrations < or = 6 ng/mL and biopsy Gleason scores < or = 5 (n = 142) and 1.0% for PSA concentrations < or = 10 ng/mL and Gleason scores < or = 6 (n = 388). The 95% upper confidence limit for the rate of false negativity at this PSA cut-off level was 2.0%. A combination of preoperative serum PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores provided the best prediction for the false-negative rates.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer who have biopsy Gleason scores < or = 6 and preoperative PSA concentrations < or = 10 ng/mL (42% of our series), a staging pelvic lymphadenectomy appears to be unnecessary. The substantial cost associated with both cross-sectional imaging and staging lymphadenectomy may therefore be avoidable in this group of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7524237     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(94)80050-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  8 in total

Review 1.  Is it necessary to do staging pelvic lymph node dissection for T1c prostate cancer?

Authors:  M V Meng; P R Carroll
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Lymphotropic nanoparticle enhanced MRI for the staging of genitourinary tumors.

Authors:  Samdeep K Mouli; Lee C Zhao; Reed A Omary; C Shad Thaxton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Localised carcinoma of the prostate: a paradigm of uncertainty.

Authors:  S S Sandhu; A V Kaisary
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  The importance of pelvic lymph node dissection in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mohamad E Allaf; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

5.  The free-to-total serum prostatic specific antigen ratio as a predictor of the pathological features of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Erim Erdem; Necmettin Atsü; Cem Akbal; Cenk Y Bilen; Ali Ergen; Haluk Ozen
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  Role of lymphadenectomy in clinically organ-confined prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nivedita Bhatta Dhar; Fiona C Burkhard; Urs E Studer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Role of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Jae Young Joung; In-Chang Cho; Kang Hyun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-07-24

8.  Prediction of the lymph node status in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of 320 surgical cases.

Authors:  Yi-Xing Chen; Zhao-Chong Zeng; Zhao-You Tang; Jia Fan; Jian Zhou; Wei Jiang; Meng-Su Zeng; Yun-Shan Tan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 6.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.