Literature DB >> 7523904

On the frequency of chromosome exchanges in a control population measured by chromosome painting.

J D Tucker1, D A Lee, M J Ramsey, J Briner, L Olsen, D H Moore.   

Abstract

Chromosome painting has been shown to be a valid and rapid method for quantifying structural chromosome rearrangements in human lymphocytes. The method is particularly useful for detecting stable aberrations which are difficult and expensive to quantify with classical methods. The inherent stability of translocations has enabled them to be used as a biodosimeter for chronic and temporally displaced exposure to radiation. Translocations may also be useful for quantifying chronic exposure to other environmental agents which may result in an accumulation of cytogenetic damage with age. Most exposures are chronic and occur at low rates, and conventional cytogenetic methods such as dicentric analysis are not expected to be informative. To understand the extent to which age and lifestyle factors impact the frequency of stable aberrations, we have performed chromosome painting on metaphase-arrested lymphocytes cultured from 47 healthy adults ranging in age from 19 to 77 years, and from umbilical cord blood obtained from eight healthy full-term infants. All subjects had previously been screened to eliminate those who had received significant occupational or accidental exposure to radiation or chemicals, and none had received chemo- or radiotherapy. Due to the infrequent occurrence of stable aberrations in peripheral lymphocytes, we analyzed the equivalent of more than 1100 metaphase cells from each of these 55 people. An average of one cell in 130 (0.77%) was observed to have a translocation or a stable insertion. A significant relationship between stable aberrations and the square of the age is apparent (R2 = 0.69, Y = 0.0615 + 0.000304 age2; p < 0.00001). These results support the hypothesis that stable aberrations accumulate with time, and are likely to integrate adverse environmental exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7523904     DOI: 10.1016/0165-1161(94)90049-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  8 in total

1.  Past exposure to densely ionizing radiation leaves a unique permanent signature in the genome.

Authors:  M Prakash Hande; Tamara V Azizova; Charles R Geard; Ludmilla E Burak; Catherine R Mitchell; Valentin F Khokhryakov; Evgeny K Vasilenko; David J Brenner
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization is necessary to detect an association between chromosome aberrations and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure in utero and reveals nonrandom chromosome involvement.

Authors:  Kirsti A Bocskay; Manuela A Orjuela; Deliang Tang; Xinhua Liu; Dorothy Warburton; Frederica P Perera
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Chromosome painting in biological dosimetry: assessment of the ability to score stable chromosome aberrations using different pairs of paint probes.

Authors:  J M García Sagredo; I Vallcorba; M D Sanchez-Hombre; M Resino; M T Ferro
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Effects of calorie restriction on chromosomal stability in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Charleen M Moore; Betty G Dunn; C Alex McMahan; Mark A Lane; George S Roth; Donald K Ingram; Julie A Mattison
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2006-11-21

5.  International study of factors affecting human chromosome translocations.

Authors:  Alice J Sigurdson; Mina Ha; Michael Hauptmann; Parveen Bhatti; Radim J Sram; Olena Beskid; E Janet Tawn; Caroline A Whitehouse; Carita Lindholm; Mimako Nakano; Yoshiaki Kodama; Nori Nakamura; Irena Vorobtsova; Ursula Oestreicher; Günther Stephan; Lee C Yong; Manfred Bauchinger; Ernst Schmid; Hai Won Chung; Firouz Darroudi; Laurence Roy; Phillipe Voisin; Joan F Barquinero; Gordon Livingston; David Blakey; Isamu Hayata; Wei Zhang; Chunyan Wang; L Michelle Bennett; L Gayle Littlefield; Alan A Edwards; Ruth A Kleinerman; James D Tucker
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  The importance of age and smoking in evaluating adverse cytogenetic effects of exposure to environmental agents.

Authors:  J D Tucker; D H Moore
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Consecutive results of blood cell count and retrospective biodosimetry: useful tools of health protection regulation for radiation workers.

Authors:  Seongjae Jang; Jin Kyung Lee; Minsu Cho; Su San Yang; Seung Hyun Kim; Wan Tae Kim
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Persistence of radiation-induced aberrations in patients after radiotherapy with C-ions and IMRT.

Authors:  Carola Hartel; Elena Nasonova; Martina C Fuss; Anna V Nikoghosyan; Juergen Debus; Sylvia Ritter
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-10-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.