Literature DB >> 7523735

Prostate cancer screening in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening trial of the National Cancer Institute.

J K Gohagan1, P C Prorok, B S Kramer, J E Cornett.   

Abstract

Screening for prostate cancer and subsequent treatment is of unknown benefit but carries known treatment related morbidity and mortality risks. The recent enthusiasm for screening in the United States contrasts sharply with the more cautious attitudes of the European and Canadian medical communities. Current data from screening series without randomization and controls are inadequate to determine screening benefit. The prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer (randomized, controlled) screening trial of the National Cancer Institute, to include 74,000 men (and 74,000 women) 60 to 74 years old, has a design power of 90% to determine a 20% reduction of prostate cancer mortality from a baseline and 3 subsequent annual screens using prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination. Randomization of participants into this trial began on November 16, 1993. Ten screening centers nationwide, a coordinating center, a laboratory and a biorepository are participating under contract.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7523735     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32412-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  16 in total

1.  Towards a philosophy of public health.

Authors:  D L Weed
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  PSA screening: the bottom line.

Authors:  M M Elhilali
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-03-21       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Knowledge, attitudes, and screening practices among older men regarding prostate cancer.

Authors:  C B Steele; D S Miller; C Maylahn; R J Uhler; C T Baker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Brief report: physicians and their personal prostate cancer-screening practices with prostate-specific antigen. A national survey.

Authors:  Evelyn C Y Chan; Michael J Barry; Sally W Vernon; Chul Ahn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Prostate cancer: 5. Diagnostic tools for early detection.

Authors:  P I Karakiewicz; A G Aprikian
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-11-03       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Latest tests for prostatic neoplasia.

Authors:  W J Marshall
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Preparing African-American men in community primary care practices to decide whether or not to have prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Ronald E Myers; Constantine Daskalakis; James Cocroft; Elisabeth J S Kunkel; Ernestine Delmoor; Matthew Liberatore; Robert L Nydick; Earl R Brown; Roy N Gay; Thomas Powell; Roberta Lee Powell
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.798

8.  Informed consent for cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen: how well are men getting the message?

Authors:  Evelyn C Y Chan; Sally W Vernon; Frederick T O'Donnell; Chul Ahn; Anthony Greisinger; Donnie W Aga
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context.

Authors:  Gerrit Draisma; Ruth Etzioni; Alex Tsodikov; Angela Mariotto; Elisabeth Wever; Roman Gulati; Eric Feuer; Harry de Koning
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Factors prompting PSA-testing of asymptomatic men in a country with no guidelines: a national survey of general practitioners.

Authors:  Frances J Drummond; Anne-Elie Carsin; Linda Sharp; Harry Comber
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.