Literature DB >> 7523732

Can radical prostatectomy alter the progression of poorly differentiated prostate cancer?

M Ohori1, J R Goad, T M Wheeler, J A Eastham, T C Thompson, P T Scardino.   

Abstract

A favorable outcome after radical prostatectomy for early stage prostate cancer has sometimes been attributed to the relatively benign natural history of the disease rather than the beneficial effects of treatment. Poorly differentiated tumors, however, are recognized as inherently aggressive and progress rapidly when managed conservatively. We determined the actuarial rate of treatment failure after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized (stages T1 to T3) poorly differentiated cancer, using as an end point an increase in the serum level of prostate specific antigen (PSA) to assess whether treatment altered the rapid progression expected of these cancers. Of 500 patients treated with radical prostatectomy, regardless of grade, the actuarial nonprogression rate was 76 +/- 5% at 5 years and 73 +/- 6% at 10 years. Poorly differentiated cancer, defined as Gleason score 7 or greater in the radical prostatectomy specimen, was present in 268 patients (54%) who had a nonprogression rate at 5 years of 55 +/- 12% compared to 92 +/- 4% for the 232 patients with a well or moderately differentiated (Gleason score less than 7) cancer (p < 0.00005). The extent of the cancer (confined or not confined) was strongly associated with progression (p < 0.00005). Only 76 of the 268 poorly differentiated tumors (28%) were confined to the prostate and the prognosis was excellent. At 5 years 85 +/- 18% of the patients had no evidence of progression, compared to 46 +/- 12% with poorly differentiated cancer extending outside the gland (p < 0.0001). In a multivariate analysis neither the grade nor volume of the tumor influenced the rate of progression when the cancer was confined to the prostate. Impalpable tumors detected by an elevated PSA level were as likely to be poorly differentiated as palpable disease (56% versus 63%) but were significantly more likely to be confined to the prostate (44% versus 24%, p < 0.01). Poorly differentiated cancers usually extend outside of the prostate by the time they are detected, and they progress rapidly. PSA increases the detection of impalpable high grade cancer confined to the gland. When these tumors are detected while still confined, most can be controlled by radical prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7523732     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32398-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  23 in total

1.  Circulating tumour cells in prostate cancer patients receiving salvage radiotherapy.

Authors:  Lori E Lowes; Michael Lock; George Rodrigues; David D'Souza; Glenn Bauman; Belal Ahmad; Varagur Venkatesan; Alison L Allan; Tracy Sexton
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  One is the new six: The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) patient-focused approach to Gleason grading.

Authors:  John R Srigley; Brett Delahunt; Lars Egevad; Hemamali Samaratunga; John Yaxley; Andrew J Evans
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Time from first detectable PSA following radical prostatectomy to biochemical recurrence: A competing risk analysis.

Authors:  Leonora de Boo; Melania Pintilie; Paul Yip; Jack Baniel; Neil Fleshner; David Margel
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Cancer/testis antigens: novel tools for discerning aggressive and non-aggressive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Takumi Shiraishi; Robert H Getzenberg; Prakash Kulkarni
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Association of caveolin-1 and -2 genetic variants and post-treatment serum caveolin-1 with prostate cancer risk and outcomes.

Authors:  Wendy J Langeberg; Salahaldin A Tahir; Ziding Feng; Erika M Kwon; Elaine A Ostrander; Timothy C Thompson; Janet L Stanford
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.104

6.  Preoperative nested reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for prostate specific membrane antigen predicts non-organ confined disease in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  John Varkarakis; Charalambos Deliveliotis; Diamandis Sideris; Nikolaos Trakas; Aris Giannopoulos
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2003-04-23

7.  Selecting treatment for high-risk, localized prostate cancer: the case for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Robert Meier; Michael K Brawer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

8.  The loss of TGF-beta signaling promotes prostate cancer metastasis.

Authors:  William H Tu; Tania Z Thomas; Naoya Masumori; Neil A Bhowmick; Agnieszka E Gorska; Yu Shyr; Susan Kasper; Tom Case; Richard L Roberts; Scott B Shappell; Harold L Moses; Robert J Matusik
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.715

9.  Can we predict real T3 stage prostate cancer in patients with clinical T3 (cT3) disease before radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Hye Won Lee; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyun Moo Lee; Han Yong Choi
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 10.  Clinical significance and treatment of biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wilmer B Roberts; Misop Han
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 3.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.