Literature DB >> 7523716

The use of prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer screening: a managed care perspective.

M R Handley1, M E Stuart.   

Abstract

A large nonprofit staff model Health Maintenance Organization experienced increased use of prostate specific antigen (PSA) as a screening test for prostate cancer beginning in May 1991. A critical evaluation of the evidence in support of PSA screening was done and concluded that the use of PSA to screen for prostate cancer did not meet the criteria for an effective screening program. A guideline stating that PSA was not recommended as a screening test was implemented focusing on a model of shared decision making. PSA test ordering decreased significantly when patients were fully informed about the evidence for PSA screening. If PSA screening had continued at the peak rate, the cascade of intervention initiated by screening would have resulted in significant complications and approximately $4,800,000 in increased costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7523716     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32362-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  5 in total

Review 1.  Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 2. Ten potential pitfalls in determining the clinical significance of benefits.

Authors:  K G Marshall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  The economic costs of early stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher S Saigal; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  The importance of patient preference in the decision to screen for prostate cancer. Prostate Patient Outcomes Research Team.

Authors:  A B Flood; J E Wennberg; R F Nease; F J Fowler; J Ding; L M Hynes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Prostate-specific antigen density--a reliable parameter for the detection of prostate cancer?

Authors:  W F Thon; F Gadban; M C Truss; M Kuczyk; U Hartmann; U Jonas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Interventions to improve decision making and reduce racial and ethnic disparities in the management of prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Saleha Sajid; Ashwin A Kotwal; William Dale
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.128

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.