Literature DB >> 7523710

Diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma: the yield of serum prostate specific antigen, digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography.

W J Ellis1, M P Chetner, S D Preston, M K Brawer.   

Abstract

Three tests are commonly used to diagnose prostate carcinoma to date: serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography. We evaluated these 3 tests in 1,001, 6-sector prostate needle biopsies to rule out prostate carcinoma. Of the biopsies 253 (25.3%) revealed prostate cancer. As a single test, PSA was superior to digital rectal examination or transrectal ultrasonography in predicting cancer in this patient population using difference of proportions tests. Receiver operating characteristic analysis also showed PSA to be the superior test. The combinations of PSA plus transrectal ultrasonography and PSA plus digital rectal examination were superior to digital rectal examination plus transrectal ultrasonography. We found cancer in 35 of 188 patients (18.6%) with intermediate PSA levels of 4.1 to 10.0 ng./ml. and normal or asymmetric nonindurated rectal examinations. Only 5 of 79 patients (6.3%) with a normal digital rectal examination and PSA level of less than 4.0 ng./ml. demonstrated carcinoma on biopsy. Of the 5 patients 4 had annual increases in PSA of 40% or greater. While hypoechoic sectors were more than twice as likely as isoechoic sectors of the prostate to contain malignancy on biopsy, nearly 37.6% of the cancers were found in isoechoic sectors. A strategy of performing biopsy of only hypoechoic sectors would have misdiagnosed 24.6% of the patients with prostate cancer. We conclude that serum PSA is the most accurate of the 3 diagnostic tests evaluated. We also recommend a systematic sextant biopsy technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7523710     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32460-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  23 in total

Review 1.  Three dimensional ultrasound and prostate cancer.

Authors:  S S Mehta; A R Azzouzi; F C Hamdy
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-11-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  A comparison of the diagnostic performance of systematic versus ultrasound-guided biopsies of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Hilco van Moerkerk; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; J Alfred Witjes; Ferdinand Frauscher; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Prostate tissue stiffness as measured with a resonance sensor system: a study on silicone and human prostate tissue in vitro.

Authors:  Simon Phipps
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Are histopathological features of prostate cancer lesions associated with identification of extracapsular extension on magnetic resonance imaging?

Authors:  Liang Wang; Oguz Akin; Yousef Mazaheri; Nicole M Ishill; Kentaro Kuroiwa; Jingbo Zhang; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Evaluation of an automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for complexed PSA on the Bayer ACS:180 system.

Authors:  Pradip Datta; Amitava Dasgupta
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.352

6.  Modalities for imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A H Hou; D Swanson; A B Barqawi
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2010-03-17

Review 7.  [The hormone refractory prostate cancer - a challenge for the internal specialist].

Authors:  Stefan Kudlacek; Johannes G Meran; Dora Beke
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2007

Review 8.  [Serum markers for early detection and staging of prostate cancer. Status report on current and future markers].

Authors:  A Haese; M Graefen; J Palisaar; E Huland; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  [Transrectal ultrasound-guided punch biopsies of the prostate. Indication, technique, results, and complications].

Authors:  J Palisaar; T Eggert; M Graefen; A Haese; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  [Transrectal sonography biofeedback training (TSB). Incontinence training after radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  W Vahlensieck
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.