Literature DB >> 7523479

European collaborative study of luteinizing hormone assay: 1. Epitope specificity of luteinizing hormone monoclonal antibodies and surface mapping of pituitary and urinary luteinizing hormone.

S Costagliola1, P Niccoli, M Florentino, P Carayon.   

Abstract

This report describes the results of the first part of the collaborative study organized by a working group sponsored by the Community Bureau of Reference of the European Community Commission. The whole study was designed to understand the causes of discrepancy among LH immunoassay methods. In the parent work, we studied the characteristics of 55 monoclonal antibodies to LH which allowed us to establish a detailed map of the antigenic surface of the hormone. In the present report we used this information to interpret the discrepancy in LH concentrations assayed with 12 different methods in 300 sera from subjects with various clinical conditions. The 55 monoclonal antibodies provided by 11 commercial companies were tested in various experiments: the apparent affinity of the antibodies was, generally but not always, higher for LH presented by a second antibody coated to plastic than for LH directly coated to plastic; 26% of the antibodies recognized the alpha subunit, 26% the beta subunit and 48% reacted only with the holomolecule (anti-alpha beta); only 28% of the antibodies were strictly specific for LH. Criss-cross experiments allowed us to distinguish 13 antigenic regions on the surface of LH: 6 were located on the alpha subunit, 3 on the beta subunit and 4 on the holomolecule. The monoclonal antibodies to the alpha beta regions further separated into 12 clusters of reactivity. Accordingly, LH appeared to exhibit at least 21 epitopes. Comparison of the immunoreactivity of various LH preparations indicated that highly purified pituitary LH and immunoaffinity purified urinary LH reacted similarly with the monoclonal antibodies and strongly differed from crude urinary LH. These data indicated that the immunoreactivity of an LH preparation depends mainly upon the degree of purification and not that much upon the origin of the preparation. The epitope specificity of the monoclonal antibodies used in 11 commercially available LH assay kits was also determined: 10 kits used at least one anti-alpha beta monoclonal antibody associated with an anti-beta monoclonal antibody in 7 cases or another anti-alpha beta monoclonal antibody in 3 cases; one kit used an anti-alpha monoclonal antibody associated with an anti-beta monoclonal antibody. None of the kits were strictly identical with regards to the epitope specificity of the monoclonal antibodies used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7523479     DOI: 10.1007/BF03347726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest        ISSN: 0391-4097            Impact factor:   4.256


  10 in total

1.  Individual differences in lutropin immunoreactivity revealed by monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  K S Pettersson; J R Söderholm
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Immunoreactive and bioactive isoforms of human thyrotropin.

Authors:  I Sergi; M J Papandreou; G Medri; C Canonne; B Verrier; C Ronin
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.736

3.  Monoclonal antibody-based discrepancies between two-site immunometric tests for lutropin.

Authors:  K Pettersson; Y Q Ding; I Huhtaniemi
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Progress and approaches in mapping the surfaces of human follicle-stimulating hormone: comparison with the other human pituitary glycoprotein hormones.

Authors:  J A Dias
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 12.015

Review 5.  Glycoprotein hormone isomorphism and assay discrepancy: the paradigm of luteinizing hormone (LH).

Authors:  S Costagliola; P Niccoli; P Carayon
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Isoelectrofocusing profiles of human urinary LH and FSH.

Authors:  P J Manberg
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Conformational intermediates in the production of the combinable form of the beta-subunit of chorionic gonadotropin.

Authors:  R W Ruddon; R F Krzesicki; J S Beebe; L Loesel; F Perini; B P Peters
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.736

8.  Interpretations of five monoclonal immunoassays of lutropin and follitropin: effects of normalization with WHO standard.

Authors:  I Vermes; H A Bonte; G v d Sluijs Veer; J Schoemaker
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 9.  Immunological and biological potencies of the different molecular species of gonadotrophins.

Authors:  A Ulloa-Aguirre; R Espinoza; P Damian-Matsumura; S C Chappel
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  European collaborative study on luteinizing hormone assay: 2. Discrepancy among assay kits is related to variation both in standard curve calibration and epitope specificity of kit monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  S Costagliola; P Niccoli; M Florentino; P Carayon
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.256

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Diabetes insipidus and increased serum levels of leptin and lactate-dehydrogenase (LDH) in an adolescent boy with a primary intracranial germinoma. Case report and an endocrinological revaluation of literature.

Authors:  C Carella; M Rotondi; A Del Buono; A M Sinisi; M L Del Basso De Caro; C M Mone; L Vizioli; F Sorvillo; G Mazziotti; A Bellastella
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 2.  Glycoprotein hormone isomorphism and assay discrepancy: the paradigm of luteinizing hormone (LH).

Authors:  S Costagliola; P Niccoli; P Carayon
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  European collaborative study of LH assay: 3. relationship of immunological reactivity, biological activity and charge of human luteinizing hormone.

Authors:  P Niccoli; S Costagliola; M C Patricot; B Mallet; M Benahmed; P Carayon
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Undetectable luteinizing hormone levels using a monoclonal immunometric assay.

Authors:  F Barbé; H Legagneur; V Watrin; M Klein; Y Badonnel
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  European collaborative study on luteinizing hormone assay: 2. Discrepancy among assay kits is related to variation both in standard curve calibration and epitope specificity of kit monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  S Costagliola; P Niccoli; M Florentino; P Carayon
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.256

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.