Literature DB >> 7522331

CNQX infused into entorhinal cortex blocks memory expression, and AMPA reverses the effect.

J A Quillfeldt1, P K Schmitz, R Walz, M Bianchin, M S Zanatta, J H Medina, I Izquierdo.   

Abstract

Rats were trained in a step-down inhibitory avoidance task using a 0.8-mA foot shock and tested for retention 26 days later. Three to five days prior to the retention test they were bilaterally implanted with cannulae aimed at the entorhinal cortex. Ten minutes before testing they received an infusion, into the entorhinal cortex, of vehicle, ciano-nitro-quinoxaline-dione (CNQX; 0.5 micrograms), amino-hydroxy-methyl-isoxalone-propionate (AMPA; 1.0 or 2.5 micrograms), or AMPA (1.0 micrograms) plus CNQX (0.5 micrograms). CNQX blocked memory expression; the effect lasted less than 90 min. AMPA had no effect of its own, but at the lower dose level it counteracted the depressant influence of CNQX. It is not likely that the effect of CNQX could have been due to an influence on performance: In separate sets of experiments the bilateral intraentorhinal infusion of CNQX (0.5 micrograms) 10 min before training did not affect either acquisition or retention of the avoidance task or general activity during 3 min of free exploration in the training box. The results indicate that the integrity of AMPA receptors in the entorhinal cortex is necessary for memory expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7522331     DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(94)90549-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  5 in total

1.  Coantagonism of glutamate receptors and nicotinic acetylcholinergic receptors disrupts fear conditioning and latent inhibition of fear conditioning.

Authors:  Thomas J Gould; Michael C Lewis
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  The role of identified neurotransmitter systems in the response of insular cortex to unfamiliar taste: activation of ERK1-2 and formation of a memory trace.

Authors:  D E Berman; S Hazvi; V Neduva; Y Dudai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  AMPA antagonists differ from NMDA antagonists in their effects on operant DRL and delayed matching to position tasks.

Authors:  D N Stephens; B J Cole
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  AMPA-receptor activation is involved in the antiamnesic effect of DM 232 (unifiram) and DM 235 (sunifiram).

Authors:  N Galeotti; C Ghelardini; A Pittaluga; A M Pugliese; A Bartolini; D Manetti; M N Romanelli; F Gualtieri
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2003-11-05       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Time-dependent modulation of AMPA receptor phosphorylation and mRNA expression of NMDA receptors and glial glutamate transporters in the rat hippocampus and cerebral cortex in a pilocarpine model of epilepsy.

Authors:  Mark William Lopes; Flávia Mahatma Schneider Soares; Nelson de Mello; Jean Costa Nunes; Aurilene Gomes Cajado; Daniel de Brito; Fabiano Mendes de Cordova; Rodrigo Maranguape Silva da Cunha; Roger Walz; Rodrigo Bainy Leal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 1.972

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.