Literature DB >> 7521978

Comparison of different assays for the quantitation of FK 506 levels in blood or plasma.

M Winkler1, U Christians, K Stoll, J Baumann, R Pichlmayr.   

Abstract

In a prospective study, we evaluated the analytical performance of different assays for the quantitation of FK 506 in blood and plasma. The new whole blood IMX assay was compared with four modifications (liquid/liquid or solid/liquid extraction of blood or plasma respectively) of the standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Both assays utilize the same monoclonal antibody for detection of FK 506. Using isolated FK 506 metabolites generated in vitro, this antibody was shown to recognize not only the unmodified parent drug but also FK 506 metabolites. In stable liver-grafted patients, sensitivity of both modifications of the whole blood ELISA was adequate. In contrast, in some stable patients, plasma ELISA was not able to detect FK 506; this was observed mainly after liquid/liquid extraction of FK 506. Sensitivity of the IMX assay was also low; in six of 10 stable liver-grafted patients, IMX levels were below the limit of detection. In all assays, FK 506 levels were found to be elevated during episodes of liver dysfunction; a possible explanation for this effect would be that of accumulation of cross-reacting FK 506 metabolites. As FK 506 metabolites are known to be less immunosuppressive than the parent drug, liver function should always be taken into account if IMX or ELISA levels are used for drug monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7521978     DOI: 10.1097/00007691-199406000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  4 in total

Review 1.  The use of therapeutic drug monitoring to optimise immunosuppressive therapy.

Authors:  S M Tsunoda; F T Aweeka
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  A risk-benefit assessment of tacrolimus in transplantation.

Authors:  M Winkler; U Christians
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Tacrolimus analysis: a comparison of different methods and matrices.

Authors:  V Warty; S Zuckerman; R Venkataramanan; J Lever; J Chao; T Mckaveney; J Fung; T Starzl
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus.

Authors:  R Venkataramanan; A Swaminathan; T Prasad; A Jain; S Zuckerman; V Warty; J McMichael; J Lever; G Burckart; T Starzl
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.447

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.