Literature DB >> 7521542

Visceral protein response to enteral versus parenteral nutrition and sepsis in patients with trauma.

K A Kudsk1, G Minard, S L Wojtysiak, M Croce, T Fabian, R O Brown.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sepsis and the route of nutrient administration are clearly related to visceral protein levels; however, the mechanisms and amount of influence are not completely defined.
METHODS: Constitutive and acute-phase protein levels were measured on days 1, 4, 7, and 10 in 68 severely injured patients with abdominal trauma indexes of 15 or more randomized to enteral or parenteral feeding. Groups were matched for age, abdominal trauma index, injury severity score, and length of stay.
RESULTS: Significantly higher levels of constitutive proteins and lower levels of acute-phase proteins were found in patients randomized to enteral feeding. Although some "hepatic protein reprioritization" appeared to be caused by nutrient route, this appeared only in the less severely injured patients. A more important factor in visceral protein levels is a reduction in septic morbidity associated with enteral feeding.
CONCLUSIONS: Enteral feeding produces greater increase in constitutive proteins and greater decreases in acute-phase proteins after severe trauma primarily caused by reduced septic morbidity with enteral feeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7521542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  13 in total

Review 1.  Enteral nutrition and acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Q P Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Nutritional papers in ICU patients: what lies between the lines?

Authors:  Jean-Charles Preiser; René Chioléro; Jan Wernerman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-12-21       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Compared with parenteral nutrition, enteral feeding attenuates the acute phase response and improves disease severity in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  A C Windsor; S Kanwar; A G Li; E Barnes; J A Guthrie; J I Spark; F Welsh; P J Guillou; J V Reynolds
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  2004 MacLean-Mueller prize enteral or parenteral nutrition for severe pancreatitis: a randomized controlled trial and health technology assessment.

Authors:  Brian E Louie; Tom Noseworthy; David Hailey; Leah M Gramlich; Philip Jacobs; Garth L Warnock
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 5.  Parenteral vs. enteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: a meta-analysis of trials using the intention to treat principle.

Authors:  Fiona Simpson; Gordon Stuart Doig
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Re-examining chemically defined liquid diets through the lens of the microbiome.

Authors:  Tiffany Toni; John Alverdy; Victoria Gershuni
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 46.802

7.  What's new in Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock? Nitrogen balance in critical patients on enteral nutrition.

Authors:  Luigi Beretta; Simona Rocchetti; Marco Braga
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2010-04

Review 8.  Nutritional immunomodulation of acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Refaat A F Hegazi; Stephen J D O'Keefe
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2007-04

Review 9.  Enteral versus parenteral nutrition and enteral versus a combination of enteral and parenteral nutrition for adults in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Oliver J Schofield-Robinson; Phil Alderson; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-06-08

10.  Prokinetic agents in critical care.

Authors:  Warren L Doherty; Bob Winter
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2003-01-10       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.