Literature DB >> 7520897

Epitope specificity of HLA class I alloantibodies. I. Frequency analysis of antibodies to private versus public specificities in potential transplant recipients.

G E Rodey1, J F Neylan, J D Whelchel, K W Revels, R A Bray.   

Abstract

Sera obtained sequentially from 419 patients awaiting solid organ transplantation were screened and analyzed for HLA class I epitope specificity. Antibodies detected in each serum were defined as "private" if reactivity could only be demonstrated against a single specificity within one of the eight major CREGs, or as "public" if reactivity in a serum could be demonstrated against two or more specificities within a single CREG. A total of 139 sera contained % PRA > 0, in which 147 specific antibodies were identified. Of the 103 positive sera, 93 (90%) contained antipublic antibodies, with or without additional antiprivate antibodies, whereas just 10 (10%) sera contained only apparent antiprivate antibodies. The success rate in defining antibody specificities was low at PRA values of 1%-20% due to weak reactivity and high false-positive rates. Specificity analysis with high test sensitivity and specificity was achieved with PRA values between 40% and 80%. At PRA values > 80%, test sensitivity remained high but specificity declined. We conclude that most anti-HLA antibodies are directed against high frequency public epitope clusters (CREGs), and highly sensitized patients develop antibodies in a fairly predictable fashion, a feature that significantly improved the success rate of specificity analysis. Since high frequency antipublic antibodies are common sequelae of CREG mismatches, further definition of HLA class I public epitopes eventually may be important in donor-recipient matching.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7520897     DOI: 10.1016/0198-8859(94)90270-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Immunol        ISSN: 0198-8859            Impact factor:   2.850


  13 in total

1.  HLA mismatching within or outside of cross-reactive groups (CREGs) is associated with similar outcomes after unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Judith A Wade; Carolyn Katovich Hurley; Steven K Takemoto; John Thompson; Stella M Davies; Thomas C Fuller; Glenn Rodey; Dennis L Confer; Harriet Noreen; Michael Haagenson; Fangyu Kan; John Klein; Mary Eapen; Stephen Spellman; Craig Kollman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Detection of HLA class I-specific antibodies by the QuikScreen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  D P Lucas; M L Paparounis; L Myers; J M Hart; A A Zachary
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  1997-05

3.  HLA-antibody testing: the immune phagocytosis inhibition test is superior to the PRA-STAT and NIH lymphocytotoxic test with respect to specificity.

Authors:  B K Flesch; M Philipp; U Cassens; J Neppert
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  The significance of pretransplant donor-specific antibodies reactive with intact or denatured human leucocyte antigen in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  H G Otten; M C Verhaar; H P E Borst; M van Eck; W G J van Ginkel; R J Hené; A D van Zuilen
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 5.  Transplant immuno-diagnostics: crossmatch and antigen detection.

Authors:  Andrew M South; Paul C Grimm
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  HLA and cross-reactive antigen group matching for cadaver kidney allocation.

Authors:  T E Starzl; M Eliasziw; D Gjertson; P I Terasaki; J J Fung; M Trucco; J Martell; J McMichael; V Scantlebury; R Shapiro; A Donner
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 7.  Application and interpretation of histocompatibility data in pediatric kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Hilda E Fernandez
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.640

8.  Differences in immunogenicity of HLA antigens and the impact of cross-reactivity on the humoral response.

Authors:  Donna P Lucas; Mary S Leffell; Andrea A Zachary
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 9.  Alloantibody Generation and Effector Function Following Sensitization to Human Leukocyte Antigen.

Authors:  Michelle J Hickey; Nicole M Valenzuela; Elaine F Reed
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  Humoral alloimmunity in transplantation: relevance of HLA epitope antigenicity and immunogenicity.

Authors:  René J Duquesnoy
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.