Literature DB >> 7520807

Comparison of the effects of commonly used wound agents on epithelialization and neovascularization.

D Kjolseth1, J M Frank, J H Barker, G L Anderson, A I Rosenthal, R D Acland, D Schuschke, F R Campbell, G R Tobin, L J Weiner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The primary effect sought with most topical wound therapy is antimicrobial. Topical wound agents are thought to promote normal healing by protecting the wound from infection. In this study, we examined the effect of six commonly used topical wound agents (bacitracin, sodium hypochlorite, silver nitrate, silver sulfadiazine, mafenide acetate, and povidone-iodine) on epithelialization and neovascularization in noninfected wounds. For this study, a new wound model was used in which direct visualization and quantification of wound epithelialization and neovascularization were carried out throughout the entire healing process. STUDY
DESIGN: We measured the effect which 500 U per g of bacitracin, 0.25 percent of sodium hypochlorite, 0.5 percent silver nitrate, 1 percent silver sulfadiazine, 8.5 percent mafenide acetate, and 10 percent povodione-iodine had on the rate of wound epithelialization and neovascularization. The agents were applied topically to 99 circular full-thickness wounds (2.25 mm diameter, 0.125 mm depth) created on the dorsum of male hairless mouse ears. This model enabled us to visualize and measure directly wound epithelialization and neovascularization repeatedly throughout healing, using intravital video microscopy and computerized digitized planimetry.
RESULTS: Control wounds and wounds treated with silver sulfadiazine (n = 18) and mafenide acetate (n = 14) epithelialized in 7.2 +/- 0.7, 7.1 +/- 0.3, and 7.3 +/- 0.3 days, respectively. This was significantly (p < 0.01) faster than the wounds treated with povidone-iodine (n = 10), sodium hypochlorite, (n = 8), and bacitracin (n = 13). Wounds treated with povidone-iodine epithelialized the slowest (11.8 +/- 0.55 days). Wound neovascularization was completed most rapidly in the groups treated with povidone-iodine and silver sulfadiazine (15.0 +/- 0.4 and 15.3 +/- 0.7 days, respectively). This was significantly (p < 0.05) faster than wounds treated with silver nitrate (n = 15), which neovascularized in 18.4 +/- 0.56 days. One-half of the wounds treated with sodium hypochlorite (eight of 16) did not epithelialize or neovascularize.
CONCLUSIONS: The various antimicrobial agents studied in our in vivo model affect wound epithelialization and neovascularization differently. These effects on these two very important aspects of healing should be taken into consideration when indicating a specific agent for treatment of different types of wounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7520807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  13 in total

1.  Influence of various treatments including povidone-iodine and healing stimulatory reagents in a rabbit ear wound model.

Authors:  Keitaro Arai; Masashi Yamazaki; Tatsuo Maeda; Takaaki Okura; Ryoji Tsuboi
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  [Chronic wounds. Novel approaches in research and therapy].

Authors:  S A Eming; J Kaufmann; R Löhrer; T Krieg
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  Cytochrome P450-derived epoxyeicosatrienoic acids accelerate wound epithelialization and neovascularization in the hairless mouse ear wound model.

Authors:  Anna Lena Sander; Heike Jakob; Katharina Sommer; Christian Sadler; Ingrid Fleming; Ingo Marzi; Johannes Frank
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Harmful misuse of white vinegar in a wrong combination.

Authors:  Basavraj S Nagoba; Namdev M Suryawanshi; Sohan P Selkar
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Can povidone-iodine solution be used safely in a spinal surgery?

Authors:  Fang-Yeng Chang; Ming-Chau Chang; Shih-Tien Wang; Wing-Kwang Yu; Chien-Lin Liu; Tain-Hsiung Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Topical photodynamic treatment with poly-L-lysine-chlorin p6 conjugate improves wound healing by reducing hyperinflammatory response in Pseudomonas aeruginosa-infected wounds of mice.

Authors:  Khageswar Sahu; Mrinalini Sharma; Harsha Bansal; Alok Dube; Pradeep Kumar Gupta
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  The Effect of Antiseptics on Adipose-Derived Stem Cells.

Authors:  Bong-Sung Kim; Veronica Ott; Arne Hendrick Boecker; Jan-Philipp Stromps; Nora Emilie Paul; Ziyad Alharbi; Ercan Cakmak; Jürgen Bernhagen; Richard Bucala; Norbert Pallua
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  A simple cost-saving measure: 2.5% mafenide acetate solution.

Authors:  Amir Ibrahim; Shawn Fagan; Tim Keaney; Karim A Sarhane; Derek A Hursey; Philip Chang; Rob Sheridan; Colleen Ryan; Ronald Tompkins; Jeremy Goverman
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.845

9.  Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation: a pilot study describing a new method for treating infected wounds.

Authors:  Allen Gabriel; Jaimie Shores; Cherrie Heinrich; Waheed Baqai; Sharon Kalina; Norman Sogioka; Subhas Gupta
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.315

10.  The potential benefit of 5% Sulfamylon Solution in the treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii-contaminated traumatic war wounds.

Authors:  John O Kucan; John P Heggers
Journal:  J Burns Wounds       Date:  2005-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.