Literature DB >> 7520676

Filgrastim in patients with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

D W Maher1, G J Lieschke, M Green, J Bishop, R Stuart-Harris, M Wolf, W P Sheridan, R F Kefford, J Cebon, I Olver, J McKendrick, G Toner, K Bradstock, M Lieschke, S Cruickshank, D K Tomita, E W Hoffman, R M Fox, G Morstyn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if filgrastim (recombinant human methionyl granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) used in addition to standard inpatient antibiotic therapy accelerated recovery from infection associated with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
SETTING: Hematology and oncology wards of four teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: 218 patients with cancer who had fever (temperature > 38.2 degrees C) and neutropenia (neutrophil count < 1.0 x 10(9)/L) after chemotherapy. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to receive filgrastim (12 micrograms/kg of body weight per day) (n = 109) or placebo (n = 107) beginning within 12 hours of empiric therapy with tobramycin and piperacillin. Patients received treatment and remained in the study until the neutrophil count was greater than 0.5 x 10(9)/L and until 4 days without fever (temperature < 37.5 degrees C) had elapsed. MEASUREMENTS: Days of neutropenia and fever and days in the study (hospitalization); time to resolution of fever and febrile neutropenia; and frequency of the use of alternative antibiotics.
RESULTS: Compared with placebo, filgrastim reduced the median number of days of neutropenia (3.0 compared with 4.0 days of a neutrophil count of < 0.5 x 10(9)/L; P = 0.005) and the time to resolution of febrile neutropenia (5.0 compared with 6.0 days; P = 0.01) but not days of fever (3.0 days for both groups). The frequency of the use of alternative antibiotics was similar in the two groups (46% compared with 41%; P = 0.48). The median number of days patients were hospitalized while on study was the same (8.0 days; P = 0.09); however, filgrastim decreased the risk for prolonged hospitalization (> 11 days, 4th quartile) by half (relative risk, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.1 to 4.1]; P = 0.02). In exploratory subset analyses, filgrastim appeared to provide the greatest benefit in patients with documented infection and in patients presenting with neutrophil counts of less than 0.1 x 10(9)/L.
CONCLUSIONS: Filgrastim treatment used with antibiotics at the onset of febrile neutropenia in patients with cancer who have received chemotherapy accelerated neutrophil recovery and shortened the duration of febrile neutropenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7520676     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-7-199410010-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  31 in total

Review 1.  Colony-stimulating factors for the management of neutropenia in cancer patients.

Authors:  David C Dale
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Febrile neutropenia in hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Michael K Keng; Mikkael A Sekeres
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 3.  Management of neutropenia in cancer patients.

Authors:  Maryam B Lustberg
Journal:  Clin Adv Hematol Oncol       Date:  2012-12

Review 4.  Filgrastim in patients with neutropenia: potential effects on quality of life.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; Nicole M Kuderer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Filgrastim. A reappraisal of pharmacoeconomic considerations in the prophylaxis and treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Authors:  J E Frampton; D Faulds
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Clinical role of GM-CSF in neutrophil recovery in relation to health care parameters.

Authors:  L S Hofstra; E G de Vries; C A Uyl-de Groot; E Vellenga
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 7.  Therapy for fungal infections in leukemia.

Authors:  R E Segal; G Y Minamoto
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 8.  The role of colony-stimulating factors and granulocyte transfusion in treatment options for neutropenia in children with cancer.

Authors:  Der-Cherng Liang
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 9.  [Febrile neutropenia: practical aspects].

Authors:  P Harten; B Seyfarth; N Schmitz
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-10-15

10.  Spanish Society of Medical Oncology consensus for the use of haematopoietic colony-stimulating factors in cancer patients.

Authors:  Alfredo Carrato; Luis Paz-Ares Rodríguez; Alvaro Rodríguez Lescure; Ana M Casas Fernández de Tejerina; Eduardo Díaz Rubio García; Pedro Pérez Segura; Manuel Constenla Figueiras; Rocío García Carbonero; José Gómez Codina; Ana Lluch Hernández; José Pablo Maroto Rey; Miguel Martín Jiménez; José Ignacio Mayordomo Cámara; José Andrés Moreno Nogueira; Antonio Rueda Domínguez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.