Literature DB >> 7519381

Serum prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, pathologic grade, and the incidence of nodal metastases in prostate cancer.

M E Sands1, G K Zagars, A Pollack, A C von Eschenbach.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the potential gains in using serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels for predicting the incidence of pelvic nodal metastases in patients with otherwise localized prostate cancer.
METHODS: We reviewed 569 patients undergoing staging lymphadenectomy, and evaluated the correlation between clinical stage, tumor grade, presurgical PSA level, and the incidence of nodal metastatic disease using univariate and multivariate regression.
RESULTS: In univariate analysis stage, grade, and PSA level were highly significant covariates with nodal metastasis. Nodal metastatic rates increased as stage increased: Stage T1 (A2), 6 of 127 (5%); Stage T2 (B), 41 of 243 (17%); Stage T3 (C), 95 of 199 (48%), (p < 0.0001). Likewise metastatic rates increased as grade increased: Gleason grades 2 to 4, 6 of 124 (5%); Gleason grades 5 and 6, 52 of 238 (22%); Gleason grade 7, 41 of 122 (34%); Gleason grades 8 to 10, 43 of 84 (51%) (p < 0.0001). The relationship between PSA level and nodal metastases was not linear and we selected the following groupings that correlated with nodal disease: 4 or less ng/mL, 4 of 104 (4%); more than 4 to 20 or less ng/mL, 73 of 335 (22%); more than 20 to 40 or less ng/mL, 35 of 85 (41%); more than 40 ng/mL, 30 of 45 (67%) (p < 0.0001). Using multivariate logistic regression, stage, grade, and PSA were independently predictive of nodal status.
CONCLUSIONS: The gains in predictive accuracy from PSA beyond that obtained from stage and grade were small and in practice would benefit fewer than 15% of our patients. Staging pelvic lymphadenectomy remains the only satisfactory method for elucidating nodal status in the majority of patients with prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7519381     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(94)80134-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  M P Wirth; O W Hakenberg; M Fröhner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Stage T1c prostate cancer: defining the appropriate staging evaluation and the role for pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  M C Beduschi; R Beduschi; J E Oesterling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Optimal treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Manfred P Wirth; Oliver W Hakenberg; Michael Froehner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  The free-to-total serum prostatic specific antigen ratio as a predictor of the pathological features of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Erim Erdem; Necmettin Atsü; Cem Akbal; Cenk Y Bilen; Ali Ergen; Haluk Ozen
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Assessment of a fragment of e-cadherin as a serum biomarker with predictive value for prostate cancer.

Authors:  R Kuefer; M D Hofer; C S M Zorn; O Engel; B G Volkmer; M A Juarez-Brito; M Eggel; J E Gschwend; M A Rubin; M L Day
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 6.  Should laparoscopy be the standard approach used for pelvic lymph node dissection?

Authors:  J C Kim; G S Gerber
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.862

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.