Literature DB >> 7518861

Development of a simplified single-apheresis approach for peripheral-blood progenitor-cell transplantation in previously treated patients with lymphoma.

H M Jones1, S A Jones, M J Watts, A Khwaja, W Mills, A Fielding, A H Goldstone, D C Linch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to develop a simplified, safe, and cost-effective peripheral-blood progenitor-cell (PBPC) mobilization protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with relapsed or resistant lymphomas were entered onto a sequential cohort study in which schedules of various granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) were administered after cyclophosphamide 1.5 g/m2. Hematologic recovery after high-dose carmustine (BCNU) etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) chemotherapy was compared with that of 46 patients who received autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) without growth factors and 28 patients who received ABMT followed by G-CSF.
RESULTS: When G-CSF (10 micrograms/kg/d) was administered from the day after the cyclophosphamide, neutropenia developed on day 8 followed by an abrupt increase in the WBC count. The optimal time for PBPC harvesting was the day on which the postnadir WBC count was greater than 8.0 x 10(9)/L, as shown by CD34+ cell counts and granulocytic-macrophage colony-forming cell (GM-CFC) assays. The reproducibility of the response was such that routine monitoring of CD34+ cell counts and GM-CFC was not necessary. A single leukapheresis on this day was adequate for prompt hematologic engraftment, and posttransplant G-CSF made little further impact on the rapid recovery. Compared with both control groups, the use of PBPC led to more rapid neutrophil recovery, markedly accelerated platelet recovery, less use of antimicrobial agents and parenteral nutrition, and more than 10 days earlier discharge from hospital. All of these differences were highly significant (P < .01).
CONCLUSION: A simplified mobilization protocol is described that requires only one apheresis to achieve rapid hematologic engraftment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7518861     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.8.1693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  9 in total

1.  A single apheresis procedure in the donor may be enough to complete an allograft using the "Mexican method" of non-ablative allografting.

Authors:  Guillermo J Ruiz-Delgado; Karla I Gutiérrez-Riveroll; César H Gutiérrez-Aguirre; David Gómez-Almaguer; Renee Eyzaguirre-Zapata; Manuel Priesca-Marin; Martha L González-Carrillo; Guillermo J Ruiz-Argüelles
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Peripheral blood stem cell transplants.

Authors:  J L Byrne; N H Russell
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Lenograstim: an update of its pharmacological properties and use in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and related clinical settings.

Authors:  C J Dunn; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Autografting with blood progenitor cells: predictive value of preapheresis blood cell counts on progenitor cell harvest and correlation of the reinfused cell dose with hematopoietic reconstitution.

Authors:  N Schwella; W Siegert; J Beyer; O Rick; J Zingsem; R Eckstein; S Serke; D Huhn
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.673

5.  Evaluation of new automated hematopoietic progenitor cell analysis in the clinical management of peripheral blood stem cell collections.

Authors:  Ellinor I Peerschke; Christine Moung; Melissa S Pessin; Peter Maslak
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 6.  Lenograstim. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in neutropenia and related clinical settings.

Authors:  J E Frampton; Y E Yarker; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Filgrastim. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in neutropenia.

Authors:  J E Frampton; C R Lee; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  ESHAP and G-CSF is a superior blood stem cell mobilizing regimen compared to cyclophosphamide 1.5 g m(-2) and G-CSF for pre-treated lymphoma patients: a matched pairs analysis of 78 patients.

Authors:  M J Watts; S J Ings; D Leverett; A MacMillan; S Devereux; A H Goldstone; D C Linch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  High-dose versus low-dose cyclophosphamide in combination with G-CSF for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization.

Authors:  Jin Seok Ahn; Seonyang Park; Seock-Ah Im; Sung-Soo Yoon; Jong-Seok Lee; Byoung Kook Kim; Soo-Mee Bang; Eun Kyung Cho; Jae Hoon Lee; Chul Won Jung; Hugh Chul Kim; Chu Myung Seong; Moon Hee Lee; Chul Soo Kim; Keun Seok Lee; Jung Ae Lee; Myung-Ju Ahn
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.884

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.