Literature DB >> 7518259

Cytokeratin 19 fragment CYFRA 21-1 compared with carcinoembryonic antigen, squamous cell carcinoma antigen and neuron-specific enolase in lung cancer. Results of an international multicentre study.

W Ebert1, H Dienemann, A Fateh-Moghadam, M Scheulen, N Konietzko, T Schleich, E Bombardieri.   

Abstract

The diagnostic value of the water-soluble cytokeratin 19 fragment CYFRA 21-1 in lung cancer was assessed in comparison with carcinoembryonic antigen, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, and neuron-specific enolase. The cut-off value, defined as 95% specificity versus a group of 526 patients suffering from benign chest diseases, was set at 3.3 micrograms/l for cytokeratin 19 fragment CYFRA 21-1 (carcinoembryonic antigen: 7.8 micrograms/l, squamous cell carcinoma antigen: 1.9 micrograms/l, neuron-specific enolase: 13.7 micrograms/l). Elevated pretreatment cytokeratin 19 fragment CYFRA 21-1 concentrations were recorded: in 112 of 244 (46%) patients with all histological types of lung cancer (carcinoembryonic antigen: 32%, squamous cell carcinoma antigen: 25%, neuron-specific enolase: 28%), in 89 of 177 (50%) patients with non-small cell lung cancer (carcinoembryonic antigen: 33%, squamous cell carcinoma antigen: 24%, neuron-specific enolase: 12%), in 47 of 81 (58%) patients with squamous cell carcinoma (carcinoembryonic antigen: 23%, squamous cell carcinoma antigen: 32%, neuron-specific enolase: 14%), in 27 of 63 (42%) patients with adenocarcinoma (carcinoembryonic antigen: 44%, squamous cell carcinoma antigen: 14%, neuron-specific enolase: 9%), in 15 of 33 (45%) patients with other non-small cell lung cancer (carcinoembryonic antigen: 36%, squamous cell carcinoma antigen: 24%, neuron-specific enolase: 14%), and in 20 of 55 (36%) patients with small cell lung cancer (carcinoembryonic antigen: 32%, neuron-specific enolase: 77%). Three of 12 patients with undefined histological type showed cytokeratin 19 fragment CYFRA 21-1 elevations. The best performance in terms of sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy was attained with the cytokeratin 19 fragment CYFRA 21-1 test in squamous cell carcinoma. In small cell lung cancer neuron-specific enolase was confirmed to be superior to the other markers. Cytokeratin 19 fragment CYFRA 21-1 concentrations increased with the extent of the malignant disease in non-small cell lung cancer. The positivity rate of cytokeratin 19 fragment CYFRA 21-1 in tumour stage TNM I was only 23% (carcinoembryonic antigen: 23%, squamous cell carcinoma antigen: 14%), i.e. the markers under study cannot be used for the diagnosis of early stage disease. Cytokeratin 19 fragment CYFRA 21-1 differentiated significantly between squamous cell carcinoma and the other histological types (p < 0.01). In addition, cytokeratin 19 fragment CYFRA 21-1 distinguished significantly the operable group TNM I-IIIa from inoperable TNM IIIb-IV (p < 0.05), but not TNM IIIa from IIIb. Out of 177 patients with non-small cell lung cancer, 90 individuals were monitored after surgery.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7518259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0939-4974


  5 in total

1.  The prognostic value of the tumour marker Cyfra 21-1 in carcinoma of head and neck and its role in early detection of recurrent disease.

Authors:  I Doweck; M Barak; N Uri; E Greenberg
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 2.  Molecular Mechanisms and Cellular Contribution from Lung Fibrosis to Lung Cancer Development.

Authors:  Anna Valeria Samarelli; Valentina Masciale; Beatrice Aramini; Georgina Pamela Coló; Roberto Tonelli; Alessandro Marchioni; Giulia Bruzzi; Filippo Gozzi; Dario Andrisani; Ivana Castaniere; Linda Manicardi; Antonio Moretti; Luca Tabbì; Giorgia Guaitoli; Stefania Cerri; Massimo Dominici; Enrico Clini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Clinical relevance of CYFRA 21-1 as a tumour marker in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Stefan A Rudhart; Francesca Gehrt; Richard Birk; Johannes D Schultz; Petar Stankovic; Robert Georgiew; Thomas Wilhelm; Boris A Stuck; Stephan Hoch
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Clinical evaluation of seven tumour markers in lung cancer diagnosis: can any combination improve the results?

Authors:  M Plebani; D Basso; F Navaglia; M De Paoli; A Tommasini; A Cipriani
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of serum neuron-specific enolase for early small cell lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Lang Huang; Jian-Guo Zhou; Wen-Xiu Yao; Xu Tian; Shui-Ping Lv; Ting-You Zhang; Shu-Han Jin; Yu-Ju Bai; Hu Ma
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.