Literature DB >> 7512735

Antigenic relationships between chloroplast and cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatases.

J Fonollá1, R Hermoso, J L Carrasco, A Chueca, J J Lázaro, F E Prado, J López-Gorgé.   

Abstract

Cytosolic fructose-1,6-biphosphatases (FBPase, EC 3.1.3.11) from pea (Pisum sativum L. cv Lincoln) and spinach (Spinacia oleracea L. cv Winter Giant) did not cross-react by double immunodiffusion and western blotting with either of the antisera raised against the chloroplast enzyme of both species; similarly, pea and spinach chloroplast FBPases did not react with the spinach cytosolic FBPase antiserum. On the other hand, spinach and pea chloroplast FBPases showed strong cross-reactions against the antisera to chloroplast FBPases, in the same way that the pea and spinach cytosolic enzymes displayed good cross-reactions against the antiserum to spinach cytosolic FBPase. Crude extracts from spinach and pea leaves, as well as the corresponding purified chloroplast enzymes, showed by western blotting only one band (44 and 43 kD, respectively) in reaction with either of the antisera against the chloroplast enzymes. A unique fraction of molecular mass 38 kD appeared when either of the crude extracts or the purified spinach cytosolic FBPase were analyzed against the spinach cytosolic FBPase antiserum. These molecular sizes are in accordance with those reported for the subunits of the photosynthetic and gluconeogenic FBPases. Chloroplast and cytosolic FBPases underwent increasing inactivation when increasing concentrations of chloroplast or cytosolic anti-FBPase immunoglobulin G (IgG), respectively, were added to the reaction mixture. However, inactivations were not observed when the photosynthetic enzyme was incubated with the IgG to cytosolic FBPase, or vice versa. Quantitative results obtained by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) showed 77% common antigenic determinants between the two chloroplast enzymes when tested against the spinach photosynthetic FBPase antiserum, which shifted to 64% when assayed against the pea antiserum. In contrast, common antigenic determinats between the spinach cytosolic FBPase and the two chloroplast enzymes were less than 10% when the ELISA test was carried out with either of the photosynthetic FBPase antisera, and only 5% when the assay was performed with the antiserum to the spinach cytosolic FBPase. These results were supported by sequencing data: the deduced amino acid sequence of a chloroplast FBPase clone isolated from a pea cDNA library indicated a 39,253 molecular weight protein, with a homology of 85% with the spinach chloroplast FBPase but only 48.5% with the cytosolic enzyme from spinach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7512735      PMCID: PMC159209          DOI: 10.1104/pp.104.2.381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  11 in total

1.  Isolation and characterization of a cDNA encoding cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase from spinach.

Authors:  Y Hur; E A Unger; A C Vasconcelos
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Purification and properties of spinach leaf cytoplasmic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase.

Authors:  G Zimmermann; G J Kelly; E Latzko
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1978-09-10       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Wheat phosphoglycerate kinase: evidence for recombination between the genes for the chloroplastic and cytosolic enzymes.

Authors:  M Longstaff; C A Raines; E M McMorrow; J W Bradbeer; T A Dyer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1989-08-25       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  U K Laemmli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Plant triose phosphate isomerase isozymes : purification, immunological and structural characterization, and partial amino Acid sequences.

Authors:  E Pichersky; L D Gottlieb
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Regulation by ca of a cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase from spinach leaves.

Authors:  F E Prado; J J Lázaro; J L Gorgé
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Spinach cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase. Purification, enzyme properties and structural comparisons.

Authors:  U S Ladror; S P Latshaw; F Marcus
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1990-04-20

8.  Separation, purification, and comparative properties of chloroplast and cytoplasmic phosphoglycerate kinase from barley leaves.

Authors:  E M McMorrow; J W Bradbeer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Structural Similarities between Spinach Chloroplast and Cytosolic Class I Fructose 1,6-Bisphosphate Aldolases : Immunochemical and Amino-Terminal Amino Acid Sequence Analysis.

Authors:  J J Marsh; K J Wilson; H G Lebherz
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Isolation and characterization of the cytosolic and chloroplastic 3-phosphoglycerate kinase from spinach leaves.

Authors:  E Köpke-Secundo; I Molnar; C Schnarrenberger
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 8.340

View more
  4 in total

1.  Construction of chimeric cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatases by insertion of a chloroplastic redox regulatory cluster.

Authors:  R Cazalis; A Chueca; M Sahrawy; J López-Gorgé
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.158

2.  Chloroplast fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase: structure and function.

Authors:  Ana Chueca; Mariam Sahrawy; Eduardo A Pagano; Julio López Gorgé
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  High level expression in Escherichia coli, purification and properties of chloroplast fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase from rapeseed (Brassica napus) leaves.

Authors:  R J Rodriguez-Suarez; R A Wolosiuk
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Surface α-1,3-glucan facilitates fungal stealth infection by interfering with innate immunity in plants.

Authors:  Takashi Fujikawa; Ayumu Sakaguchi; Yoko Nishizawa; Yusuke Kouzai; Eiichi Minami; Shigekazu Yano; Hironori Koga; Tetsuo Meshi; Marie Nishimura
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 6.823

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.