Literature DB >> 7512326

Shifting proportions of gastric adenocarcinomas.

J C Salvon-Harman1, B Cady, S Nikulasson, U Khettry, M D Stone, P Lavin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To substantiate reports of increasing proportions of gastric adenocarcinoma of diffuse histologic type and in the proximal portion of the stomach, to better understand the prognostic features that govern survival, and to determine whether alterations of operative strategy might improve the surgical results.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 289 consecutive patients with gastric adenocarcinoma operated on by general surgeons over a 26-year period. Records were reviewed for location, histologic type, resection, operative mortality, lymph node status, and outcome.
SETTING: The Section of Surgical Oncology, the New England Deaconess Hospital, Boston, Mass. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival rate, length of life of the patients who died, and operative mortality.
RESULTS: A marked and significant shift of gastric adenocarcinoma to a proximal location (54% between 1985 and 1990) occurred over 26 years (P = .0075) with a significant stage improvement at presentation (P = .0235). Percentages of cancers that were of the diffuse, poorly differentiated histologic type increased to 48%. More curative operations were performed in the last period (61%), and this upward trend from 37% was significant. Proximal gastric cancers had a poorer prognosis with more operative deaths, more lymph node metastases, and worse survival rates than distal cancers. Poor survival rates occurred even when comparing patients with negative lymph nodes or favorable histologic features with patients with similar distal cancers.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant increases in the proportion of proximal cancers, survival rates have improved only slightly. Nodal status plays a less prognostic role than does location or histologic type but does provide prognostic information for individual locations. Survival rates for diffuse histologic cancer were consistently worse than those for intestinal histologic cancer, which emphasizes the underlying disease biology controlling outcome. Radical lymphadenectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma would not improve surgical outcome in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7512326     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420280053007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  32 in total

1.  Clinicopathological analysis of patients with gastric cancer in 1200 cases.

Authors:  W X Niu; X Y Qin; H Liu; C P Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Gastric Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-06

3.  Circulating microRNA-22-3p Predicts the Malignant Progression of Precancerous Gastric Lesions from Intestinal Metaplasia to Early Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Tsung-Hsing Chen; Cheng-Tang Chiu; Chieh Lee; Yin-Yi Chu; Hao-Tsai Cheng; Jun-Te Hsu; Ren-Chin Wu; Ta-Sen Yeh; Kwang-Huei Lin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Comparison of the clinicopathological characteristics and the survival outcomes between the Siewert type II/III adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Wei-Han Zhang; Xin-Zu Chen; Kai Liu; Kumar Anil; Kun Yang; Jia-Ping Chen; Zong-Guang Zhou; Jian-Kun Hu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 5.  Minimally invasive surgery in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Sang-Yong Son; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  CT findings in diagnosis of gastric bare area invasion: potential prognostic factors for proximal gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Rui-Jia Sun; Lei Tang; Xiao-Ting Li; Zi-Yu Li; Ying-Shi Sun
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Is adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction different between Japan and western countries? The incidence and clinicopathological features at a Japanese high-volume cancer center.

Authors:  Shinichi Hasegawa; Takaki Yoshikawa; Haruhiko Cho; Akira Tsuburaya; Osamu Kobayashi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Long-term outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer compared with total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Isao Nozaki; Shinji Hato; Takaya Kobatake; Koji Ohta; Yoshirou Kubo; Akira Kurita
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Lower esophageal sphincter-preserving laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy in patients with early gastric cancer: a method for the prevention of reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  Dong Jin Kim; Jun Hyun Lee; Wook Kim
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  Comparison of colorectal and gastric cancer: survival and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Bijan Moghimi-Dehkordi; Azadeh Safaee; Mohammad R Zali
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.