Literature DB >> 7512125

Use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor before, during, and after fludarabine plus cytarabine induction therapy of newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes: comparison with fludarabine plus cytarabine without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

E Estey1, P Thall, M Andreeff, M Beran, H Kantarjian, S O'Brien, S Escudier, L E Robertson, C Koller, S Kornblau.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administered before, during, and after fludarabine plus cytarabine (ara-C; FA) chemotherapy affected complete response (CR) rate, infection rate, blood count recovery, or survival in patients with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 112 patients with newly diagnosed AML (n = 69) or MDS (n = 43) received G-CSF 400 micrograms/m2/d 1 day before (presenting WBC count < 50,000/microL) and/or during (all patients) fludarabine 30 mg/m2/d and ara-C 2 g/m2/d for 5 days (FLAG). G-CSF continued until a CR was achieved. Results were compared with those in 85 newly diagnosed patients (54 AML, 31 MDS) previously treated with FA without G-CSF.
RESULTS: Patients in both groups were relatively old (median age of all patients, 63 years), and were likely to have prognostically unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities (36% had abnormalities of chromosomes 5 and 7 [-5/-7]). G-CSF accelerated recovery to > or = 1,000 neutrophils (P < .0001; median, 34 days for FA, 21 days for FLAG), but logistic regression provided no evidence that the CR rate was higher with FLAG than with FA (P = .50), with unadjusted CR rates of 63% and 53%, respectively. This may reflect relatively high rates of death before neutrophil recovery in both groups. Rates of infection were similar in both groups. The follow-up duration in remission is short, and much of these data remain censored. To date, survival is similar with FA and FLAG.
CONCLUSION: On average, G-CSF before, during, and after FA had no effect on CR or infection rates in this population, in which elderly patients and poor prognostic factors were prevalent. The use of FA and laminar airflow rooms rather than more usual therapy needs to be considered when analyzing the results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7512125     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.4.671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  39 in total

Review 1.  Promising approaches in acute leukemia.

Authors:  J Cortes; H M Kantarjian
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Prognostic factors for intensive care unit admission, intensive care outcome, and post-intensive care survival in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a single center experience.

Authors:  Peter Schellongowski; Thomas Staudinger; Michael Kundi; Klaus Laczika; Gottfried J Locker; Andja Bojic; Oliver Robak; Valentin Fuhrmann; Ulrich Jäger; Peter Valent; Wolfgang R Sperr
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Retrospective comparison of clofarabine versus fludarabine in combination with high-dose cytarabine with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as salvage therapies for acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Pamela S Becker; Hagop M Kantarjian; Frederick R Appelbaum; Barry Storer; Sherry Pierce; Jianqin Shan; Stephan Faderl; Elihu H Estey
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 4.  Colony-stimulating factors in the treatment of older patients with acute myelogenous leukaemia.

Authors:  S Bolam; T Hamblin
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Phase I study of GTI-2040, a ribonucleotide reductase antisense, with high dose cytarabine in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Rebecca B Klisovic; William Blum; Zhongfa Liu; Zhiliang Xie; Cheryl Kefauver; Lenguyen Huynh; James A Zwiebel; Steven M Devine; John C Byrd; Michael R Grever; Kenneth K Chan; Guido Marcucci
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2013-11-01

Review 6.  Fludarabine. An update of its pharmacology and use in the treatment of haematological malignancies.

Authors:  J C Adkins; D H Peters; A Markham
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Acute myeloid leukaemia: optimising treatment in elderly patients.

Authors:  Graham H Jackson; Penelope R A Taylor
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 8.  Management of Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the Elderly: Current Strategies and Developments.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Bryan; Elias J Jabbour
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  A phase II trial of sequential ribonucleotide reductase inhibition in aggressive myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Joshua F Zeidner; Judith E Karp; Amanda L Blackford; B Douglas Smith; Ivana Gojo; Steven D Gore; Mark J Levis; Hetty E Carraway; Jacqueline M Greer; S Percy Ivy; Keith W Pratz; Michael A McDevitt
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 10.  Childhood acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Hiroto Inaba
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 6.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.