Literature DB >> 7510497

Nucleic acid structure analysis: a users guide to a collection of new analysis programs.

M S Babcock1, E P Pednault, W K Olson.   

Abstract

Common nomenclature describing the geometry of nucleic acid structures was established at a 1988 EMBO Workshop on DNA Curvature and Bending (Diekmann, S. (1988) J. Mol. Biol. 208, 787-791; Diekmann, S. (1989) The EMBO Journal 8, 1-4; Sarma, R.H. (1988) J. Biomol. Structure & Dynamics 6, 391-395; Dickerson, R.E. (1989) J. Biomol. Structure & Dynamics 6, 627-634; Dickerson, R.E. et al. (1989) Nuc. Acids Res. 17, 1979-1803). We have subsequently developed and incorporated sophisticated mathematics in a computer program to calculate the parameters described by the guidelines. The program calculates all the local parameters relating complementary bases and neighboring base and base pairs in both Cartesian and helical coordinate frames. In addition, the main mathematical property requested by the EMBO guidelines--that the magnitude of the parameters be independent of strand or direction of measurement--is accomplished without the use of a midway coordinate frame for the rotational parameters. The mathematics preserve the physical intuition used in defining the parameters; in particular, the rotational parameters are true rotations based on a simple physical model (rotation at constant angular velocity for a unit amount of time), not Euler angles or angles between vectors and planes as is the case with other approaches. As a result, the mathematical equations are symmetric with the property that a 5 degrees tilt is the same as a 5 degrees roll or a 5 degrees twist, except that the rotations take place about different axes. In other approaches, a 5 degrees tilt can mean a different amount of net rotation from a 5 degrees roll or a 5 degrees twist. In addition, a great deal of flexibility is built into the program so that the user has control over the analysis, including the input format, the coordinate frame used for the base pairing relationship, the point about which the rotations are performed, and which geometric relationships are analyzed. While there is a great deal of flexibility, the program is easy to use. Interactive queries and user accessible files make the options in the program very convenient to tailor to individual needs. In addition, there is also a program that calculates bond lengths, valence angles, and torsion angles along the nucleic acid backbone, and within the sugar and base rings. Another program 'learns' the identities of the bond lengths, valence angles, and torsion angles that the user would like to determine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7510497     DOI: 10.1080/07391102.1993.10508018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn        ISSN: 0739-1102


  8 in total

1.  Accurate representation of B-DNA double helical structure with implicit solvent and counterions.

Authors:  Lihua Wang; Brian E Hingerty; A R Srinivasan; Wilma K Olson; Suse Broyde
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Relating repair susceptibility of carcinogen-damaged DNA with structural distortion and thermodynamic stability.

Authors:  Min Wu; Shixiang Yan; Dinshaw J Patel; Nicholas E Geacintov; Suse Broyde
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Conformational specificity of non-canonical base pairs and higher order structures in nucleic acids: crystal structure database analysis.

Authors:  Shayantani Mukherjee; Manju Bansal; Dhananjay Bhattacharyya
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  DNA bending: the prevalence of kinkiness and the virtues of normality.

Authors:  R E Dickerson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Structure of the acceptor stem of Escherichia coli tRNA Ala: role of the G3.U70 base pair in synthetase recognition.

Authors:  A Ramos; G Varani
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Stereochemical basis of DNA bending by transcription factors.

Authors:  M Suzuki; N Yagi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-06-25       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Analysis of co-crystal structures to identify the stereochemical determinants of the orientation of TBP on the TATA box.

Authors:  M Suzuki; M D Allen; N Yagi; J T Finch
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Comparison of rotation models for describing DNA conformations: application to static and polymorphic forms.

Authors:  J Mazur; R L Jernigan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.033

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.