Literature DB >> 7509516

FK506 trough levels in whole blood and plasma in liver transplant recipients. Correlation with clinical events and side effects.

L Bäckman1, M Nicar, M Levy, D Distant, C Eisenstein, T Renard, R Goldstein, B Husberg, T A Gonwa, G Klintmalm.   

Abstract

FK506 trough levels were measured by ELISA in paired whole-blood and plasma samples in 59 liver transplant recipients. Patients with nephrotoxicity had higher FK506 whole-blood and plasma levels (27.5 +/- 3.2 ng/ml and 1.44 +/- 0.14 ng/ml) than patients with stable liver function (15.2 +/- 2.1 ng/ml and 0.98 +/- 0.15 ng/ml, P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). Patients with acute rejection had FK506 whole-blood and plasma levels within the same range as patients with stable liver function. Patients with severe neurotoxicity had significantly higher FK506 whole-blood and plasma levels (31.3 +/- 6.8 ng/ml and 3.9 +/- 1.4 ng/ml) in comparison with patients with mild-to-moderate neurotoxicity (18.1 +/- 2.4 ng/ml and 1.1 +/- 0.13 ng/ml) (P = 0.048 and P < 0.001, respectively). Long-term use of FK506 was associated with a significant reduction in glomerular filtration rate at 1-year posttransplant in patients on primary FK506 treatment (33%, P < 0.001). The reduction in glomerular filtration rate correlated with the yearly mean FK506 plasma but not with whole-blood levels or FK506 dose. There was a correlation between FK506 whole-blood and plasma levels (r = 0.713, P < 0.001) but not between the levels (whole blood or plasma) and FK506 dose (mg/day or mg/kg/day). The mean FK506 whole-blood and plasma levels were 14.1 +/- 0.26 ng/ml and 0.96 +/- 0.75 ng/ml, respectively. There was a large intra- and interpatient variability in the ratio between whole-blood and plasma levels (range 1.0-73.5), with a mean ratio of 18.0 +/- 0.28 (+/- SEM). In conclusion, monitoring of FK506 trough levels is of importance to avoid nephro- and neurotoxicity, but monitoring is only of limited help to avoid acute rejection. Monitoring of FK506 levels in plasma seems to be superior to that in whole blood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7509516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  22 in total

1.  Recurrent reversible cerebral edema after long term immunosuppression with tacrolimus.

Authors:  Manuela Reinohs; Torsten Straube; Petra Baum; Jörg Berrouschot; Armin Wagner
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Cyclosporine A inhibits interleukin-8 production in a human colon epithelial cell line (HT-29).

Authors:  O Saitoh; R Matsuse; K Sugi; K Nakagawa; K Uchida; K Maemura; K Kojima; I Hirata; K Katsu
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 3.  Clinical Evaluation of Modified Release and Immediate Release Tacrolimus Formulations.

Authors:  Simon Tremblay; Rita R Alloway
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 4.  The use of therapeutic drug monitoring to optimise immunosuppressive therapy.

Authors:  S M Tsunoda; F T Aweeka
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Daily dosing of tacrolimus in patients treated with HIV-1 therapy containing a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor or raltegravir.

Authors:  Markus Bickel; Evrim Anadol; Martin Vogel; Wolf Peter Hofmann; Nils von Hentig; Johannes Kuetscher; Michael Kurowski; Christian Moench; Tessa Lennemann; Thomas Lutz; Wolf Otto Bechstein; Hans Reinhard Brodt; Jürgen Rockstroh
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Population pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in full liver transplant patients: modelling of the post-operative clearance.

Authors:  Marie Antignac; Jean Sebastien Hulot; Emmanuel Boleslawski; Laurent Hannoun; Yvan Touitou; Robert Farinotti; Philippe Lechat; Saïk Urien
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Prediction tacrolimus blood levels based on the Bayesian method in adult kidney transplant patients.

Authors:  Marie Antignac; Christine Fernandez; Benoît Barrou; Mariona Roca; Jean-Louis Favrat; Saïk Urien; Robert Farinotti
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.441

8.  Determination of the most influential sources of variability in tacrolimus trough blood concentrations in adult liver transplant recipients: a bottom-up approach.

Authors:  Cécile Gérard; Jeanick Stocco; Anne Hulin; Benoit Blanchet; Céline Verstuyft; François Durand; Filomena Conti; Christophe Duvoux; Michel Tod
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 9.  A risk-benefit assessment of tacrolimus in transplantation.

Authors:  M Winkler; U Christians
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 10.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Christine E Staatz; Susan E Tett
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.